Wave Genetics has shown that genetic traits can be changed, activated and disactivated by use of resonant waves, beamed at the DNA. The proponents of Wave Genetics have, through well-designed and implemented double-blind experiments, physically and clinically, repeatedly proven the ability of Wave Genetics technology to regrow vital internal organs, in vivo, without the requirement of difficult, dangerous and expensive surgical procedures. Applications of Wave Genetics technologies have uncovered the entire range of functionality of the DNA (including the functions of so-called "junk DNA) and the entire Genome. Wave Genetics makes the entirety of the DNA system available and directly controllable, for the direct benefit of all life, without the need for dangerous and antiquated "recombinant DNA" methods, and without the need for any "stem cell" culturing techniques. Additional applications which arise from Wave Genetics include a very reliable life extension technology, which could be easily applied to any living being, no surgical intervention required.

Dr. Peter Gariaev - image from Kreaprenör

Wave Genetics has been researched principally in Russia, by a group of scientists around Dr. Peter Gariaev, the discoverer of the DNA phantom effect. That research has recently come to an abrupt halt, as a result of heavy handed intervention by some high level "skeptics" in the Russian Academy of Sciences. Skeptics are the watchdogs of orthodoxy. Those operating in the field of medicine call themselves quackbusters, but every scientific endeavor has their dedicated 'skeptics' who watch that no new paradigms should evolve and who attack anyone coming even close to changing the status quo in science.

Perhaps it is no accident that the work of Gariaev and his team has come under attack, since Wave Genetics promises to make today's genetic engineering look like the Wright brothers' first flight, compared with a modern airliner. With huge sums of money invested by the likes of Monsanto and Genentech in today's comparatively very 'old hat' recombinant genetic modification technologies, it is no wonder that those developing the successor technology are being viciously attacked.

Robert Neil Boyd has been in contact with Gariaev and has written a short piece exposing this ongoing suppression of scientific research:

The Mistaken Suppression of the Next Generation of Medical Practices
("Wave Genetics") by the Russian Academy of Science

A group internal to the Russian Academy of Science, called the "Group to Combat Pseudoscience in Russia" often goes well beyond the bounds of highly regarded bedrock scientific research principles, such as Popp's Criteria, particularly regarding recent empirical and powerful experimental results in genetics research. This group has long been known for attacking and suppressing any theoretical results which fall outside of the boundaries of of what is deemed to be "officially acceptable".

Acceptable according to whom? Exxon? The Bilderberg group? Donald Duck?

Or is it that whoever pays the leader of this "combating pseudoscience" group, Krugliakov, the most money, gets whatever ruling they want, from out of the group??

It is clear that Krugliakov has acted to revive a former soviet policy regarding Russian science called "Neolysenkoism", a policy which suppresses and attacks all "unacceptable" scientific results and theories, and attacks all "dissenting" scientific results and theories.

And who defines what exactly is "Pseudoscience", and according to what exacting scientific criteria? Certainly it is clear that Popp's Criteria for accuracy in the sciences are not any part of the reasonings behind the efforts of this "Pseudoscience" group.

In fact, the activities of this "Group to Combat Pseudoscience in Russia" should themselves properly be termed as "Pseudoscience", since they often act with no rational scientific basis, and make policy decisions with no scientific justification whatsoever. They should be required to justify and exactly prove their findings, just as any other scientific endeavor is expected to do.

Science is a quest for the Truth, trying to discover the actual facts of the behaviors of Nature, so that we can use these facts in beneficial ways. Truth in Science is not based on the popularity of some theoretical belief, nor popular opinion. Science is not based on personal conveniences, personal advantages, or preferences.

Either a thing is true or it is not. We don't get to vote on such things as to whether gravity will cause things which are dropped, to fall towards the center of the planet. We are in the position where it is our condition to try to understand the inner workings of how the Universe operates. Then, we should use our understandings to the advantage of All Life.

We are not in any position to dictate terms to the Universe regarding what is or is not "acceptable behavior" on the part of the Universe, as according to some theory or belief or preference or another, such as relativity theory or string theory. The Universe is how it is and acts the way it acts. And it is up to us to understand the Universe, as it is. Not as it should be according to the preferences of some corporation with vested monetary interests or according to some political advantage or preference.

The recent suppressive dismantling of a hugely promising set of physically proved results in Genetics Research, which meet Popp's Criteria, called "Wave Genetics", by Krugliakov and the "Group to Combat Pseudoscience in Russia", is certainly not due to any proper scientific method. This group's agenda is highly questionable, and is certainly not in the best interests of Science, nor are these suppressive behaviors in the best interests of Life and Humanity.

Wave Genetics has, through well-designed and implemented, double-blind experiments, physically and clinically, repeatedly proven the ability of the Wave Genetics technology to re-grow vital internal organs, in vivo, without the requirement of expensive and difficult and dangerous surgical procedures. Applications of Wave Genetics technologies have uncovered the entire of the DNA functionality (including the functions of so-called "junk DNA) and the entire of the Genome. Wave Genetics makes the entirety of DNA system available and directly controllable, for the direct benefit of All Life, without the need for dangerous and antiquated "recombinant DNA" methods, and without the need for any "stem cell" culturing techniques.

There are vast numbers of additional applications which arise from Wave Genetics, in addition to regenerating various body parts without the requirement for invasive techniques, such as a very reliable life extension technology, which can be easily applied to any living being, with no surgical intervention required. For this technology to be at all looked down on, casts shame on the Russian Academy of Science, a body which is expected to be above and beyond all political movements and personal preferences, inspired to bring forth the best possible results to all of science and to all of Life.

I have found another piece of relevant information on wave genetics, an open letter by Dr. Peter Gariaev which you will find just below, as the second part of this article.

Law Project for Psychiatric Rights v. Matsutani, et al.

The Law Project for Psychiatric Rights is suing individual psychiatrists, their employers, pharmacies, state officials, and a medical education and publishing company for their roles in submitting fraudulent claims to Medicaid.

The Complaint points out the lack of science supporting the practice and the methods used by the pharmaceutical industry to induce psychiatrists to improperly prescribe these drugs.

"Even though the drug companies have been using these methods to induce psychiatrists to prescribe these drugs, it is the psychiatrists' responsibility to base their decisions on the facts, not drug company marketing," said Mr. Gottstein, continuing, "the uncritical acceptance of pharmaceutical company hype represents a massive betrayal of trust by the psychiatrists prescribing these drugs to children and youth."

The Law Project for Psychiatric Rights is a public interest law firm devoted to the defense of people facing the horrors of forced psychiatric drugging and electroshock. PsychRights is further dedicated to exposing the truth about psychiatric interventions and the courts being misled into ordering people subjected to these brain and body damaging drugs against their will. Extensive information about these dangers, and about the tragic damage caused by electroshock, is available on the PsychRights web site: http://psychrights.org/.

The suit is a whistleblower suit which means, not only is there a chance of putting a stop to psychiatric overprescribing under false premises which, at times, is responsible for tragic deaths, but there is also a good possibility that the growing anti-psychiatry movement will gain some financial means to make its campaign to stop psychiatric abuses more effective.

In the US, a lawsuit can be brought under the federal False Claims Act, which authorizes private parties to bring fraud actions on behalf of the Government. These cases are also called "whistleblower suits" or "qui tam," actions. Those who file them are entitled to a share in the recovery, which means a percentage of court-mandated fines is usually designated to go to those who bring the action.

This is an article by Jon Rappoport. It first appeared on Jon's site nomorefakenews.com

JANUARY 20, 2010. Brent Leung, a young Canadian filmmaker, has just released House of Numbers, which explores every basic official fact about AIDS--and finds these facts shot through with doubts and holes.

The accuracy of HIV tests; the competing and unclear definitions of AIDS; whether HIV causes AIDS; overblown case numbers; the safety and efficacy of the medicines; the supposed lethality of HIV; all these issues come up for review.

What's remarkable is that Leung gained access to major AIDS researchers and bureaucrats and put them on camera for interviews: Robert Gallo; Tony Fauci; Robin Weiss; David Baltimore; Luc Montagnier. You'll see a gallery of officialdom on display.

Predictably, House of Numbers has ignited controversy. It questions authority.

Source: Examiner.com

Katrina Derrico
According to a news article in Russia this week, autopsies on H1N1 victims doctors have confirmed pneumonia was not the cause of death. Cardiopulmonary insufficiency and cardiogenic shock are to blame and antibiotics should not be used.
The virus is said to be a mixture of Para influenza and influenza A/H1N1. It penetrates the mucus membranes, and then enters directly into the lungs causing bleeding.

Ukraine Deaths are not Pneumonia

The Head of the Chernivtsi regional forensic bureau, Professor Victor Bachinsky PhD, makes a strong statement, "All the victims of the virus in Bukovina (22 persons aged 20 to 40 years) died not from bilateral (double) pneumonia, as previously thought, but as a result of viral distress syndrome, i.e. the total destruction of the lungs. In the Chernivtsi region 18 people have died. We studied all the history and evidence from this disease, preclinical, clinical, resuscitation. When we perform an autopsy organs and tissues have histological studies (cell analysis) and we concluded that it was not pneumonia, and has no relation to pneumonia whatsoever."

The Huffington Post
December 14, 2009
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
Posted: December 8, 2009 04:31 PM

On November 24, 2009, Novartis officially opened its first, large-scale vaccine manufacturing facility in the U.S. Located in Holly Springs, North Carolina. The project is a collaborative effort between Novartis and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which contributed $457M for the design, construction, and licensing of the facility.

For its part in the deal, Novartis is required to provide two commercial-scale lots of "pre-pandemic" vaccine annually for a minimum of three years. In addition, the government has the right to exercise options to purchase influenza vaccine over the next 17 years. (1) Currently, 191 employees work at the plant but that will increase to 350 persons when fully operational, anticipated to be sometime in 2011. The Holly Springs facility will be able to roll out 150 million flu shots per year.

Even though its use has not been approved by U.S. regulators, the plant will be producing MF59 as early as December 2009.(2) MF59 is Novartis' proprietary and controversial adjuvant composed of squalene and a surfactant called Tween80, also known as polysorbate 80. Back in July, 2009, the department of HHS purchased over $343.8M of "oil-in-water" adjuvant from Norvartis.(3) It looks like the government may want to take delivery on its purchase some time soon.

Posted by: Dr. Mercola

December 10 2009 | 6,348 views

Health officials across Canada are being asked to hold back a batch of swine flu vaccine that appears to be causing higher rates of severe allergic reactions.

The vaccine's manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, is asking governments to stop using vaccine doses from one particular lot shipment issued in late October.

Bloomberg reports that Glaxo advised Canadian doctors to hold off on using a batch of the vaccine while the company probes reports of higher-than-expected occurrences of a side effect known as anaphylaxis.

The batch of 172,000 doses of Arepanrix was linked to more cases of acute allergic reactions, including swollen tongues, throats and respiratory distress, than is expected, spokeswoman Gwenan White said.

According to Manitoba health officials, severe allergic reactions from the batch in question was seen in one of 20,000, which is far higher than the typical rate of one in 100,000.

Sources:

CBC News November 19, 2009

Bloomberg November 24, 2009

HealthZone.ca November 20, 2009

ecPulse.com November 25, 2009

AN EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH
DR. BARBARA STARFIELD:
By Jon Rappoport
www.insolutions.info
www.nomorefakenews.com

On July 26, 2000, the US medical community received a titanic shock to the system, when one of its most respected and honored public-health experts, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revealed her findings on healthcare in America.

The landmark Starfield study, “Is US health really the best in the world?”, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, came to the following conclusions:

Every year in the US there are:

12,000 deaths from unnecessary surgeries;

7,000 deaths from medication errors in hospitals;

20,000 deaths from other errors in hospitals;

80,000 deaths from infections acquired in hospitals;

106,000 deaths from FDA-approved correctly prescribed medicines.

The total of medically-caused deaths in the US every year is 225,000.

This makes the medical system the third leading cause of death in the US, behind heart disease and cancer.

by Tom DeWeese
December 1, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

As the battle over government-controlled health care continues, many Americans simply want out of the whole mess. They instead seek a plan of wellness based on healthy eating and natural supplements.

That approach, however, is the opposite of the health care agenda of the American Medical Association and the Pharmaceutical industry. Those forces, which literally control America’s health industry, are based on sickness. The sicker you are, the more drugs you will buy.

In addition, insurance companies, working hand in hand with the AMA and the drug companies, refuse to provide coverage for the wellness approach. Most won’t pay for natural supplements nor will they pay for visits to homeopaths or chiropractors. The only thing most Americans can do when sick (and unable to afford to pay for natural treatment out of their pockets) is to stick with the big pharma/AMA game plan. In short, it is cheaper to be sick than to try to stay well.

However, in spite of a stacked deck in favor of the sickness agenda, more Americans are going for wellness and the natural supplement industry is growing. In response, and to preserve their dominance over health care, big pharma is lobbying hard to get the Food and Drug Administration to make many natural supplements available only by prescriptions issued by AMA licensed doctors. In other efforts, they seek to drastically reduce the dosage of natural supplements sold over the counter, making them useless. Again, only a prescription would allow a workable dosage.

November 28, 2009
By NISHOREN, Posted by Stephen Fox (about the submitter)
opednews.com
For OpEdNews: Posted by Stephen Fox - Writer
from: http://www.nishoren.org/en/?p=551

Labelled only as "amino acid and others"

On September 14, 2009, two new food additives from Ajinomoto were judged to be "safe" by the Expert Committee for Genetically Modified Food and Others at the Food Safety Commission (FSC). The appraisal was open for public comments and it seems likely that the two novel amino acids will be approved by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labour by the end of November.

So far, several GMO food additives have been approved, but they were basically used for food processing, as in the case of enzymes like alpha amylase for improved productivity. There have been no cases of GMO food additives that are used directly as seasoning as is the case of amino acids. Thus, when Ajinomoto first submitted these GMO products, there were no established method for safety appraisal.

That was why the Food Safety Commission has published a "Directive for safety assessment of food additives which are produced using genetically modified micro-organisms and which are highly refined and have non-protein characteristics, including amino acids." (Many studies have verified that the process of genetic engineering can produce unpredicted toxins or allergens.)

Vaccines Cause Autism, News From Scientific Think Tank States.
Curtiss Lee Linderman Sr
November 20, 2009
American Chronic

Sound and Reproducible Science Implicates Vaccines in the Autism Epidemic

In 2003, The Center for Modeling Optimal Outcomes LLC, began researching the neuroscience of business and how applying this tactic could possibly enhance business practices. What they found during their research has possibly shaken the very foundations of vaccine science and toxicology.

This New Jersey based think tank sent out a press release on the seventeenth of November 2009 that states that their studies, which implicate vaccines as the cause of autism, are "Grounded on a solid foundation of the laws of physics and chemistry." One of the aspects of this research that I find most notable is that this is a non-conflicted think tank that was not even looking into these issues for the purpose of obtaining information regarding the causation of autism. This was, for all intents and purposes, an accident.

By mid 2005, two years into their research, The Center for Modeling Optimal Outcomes LLC had gained great knowledge and made some very substantial findings. They began by researching brain chemicals (neurohormones) that were seemingly involved in logic and emotions. These are of course two areas that have a direct link to productivity in the workplace. With their findings however, they were forced to take two very different paths in the study. One was of course continuing the business model aspect of their research; the other is the reason for this article.