<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>La Leva di Archimede (ENG)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2008-07-21:/eng//3</id>
    <updated>2012-02-03T15:28:55Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Association for freedom of choice and free information</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 5.11</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Do Harsh Pot Laws Create a Dangerous Drinking Culture? 5 Reasons to Get Stoned Instead of Drunk</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2012/02/do_harsh_pot_laws_create_a_dangerous_drinking_culture_5_reasons_to_get_stoned_instead_of_drunk.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2012:/eng//3.3595</id>

    <published>2012-02-01T10:38:53Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T15:28:55Z</updated>

    <summary>AlterNet January 27, 2012 By Kristen Gwynne Myths about marijuana convince people that alcohol is safer, but science shows pot is the healthier choice. Alcohol kills approximately 70,000 people per year. Prescription pills, which have helped overdose become the leading cause of accidental death in America, result in more than 20,000 deaths per year. Marijuana has never killed anybody. Although scientific research is available to show that pot is relatively harmless, and in fact medically beneficial, myths and propaganda about the plant’s alleged harm lead to marijuana laws so severe they often have the unintended consequence of driving people to drink alcohol, a much more dangerous substance than pot. Many...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>sal</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Legislation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Medicine Alternatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org">AlterNet</a><br />
January 27, 2012<br />
By Kristen Gwynne</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><i>Myths about marijuana convince people that alcohol is safer, but science shows pot is the healthier choice.</i></span><br /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201202011104.jpg" width="310" height="220" alt="201202011104.jpg" style="float:left; padding-top:6px; padding-right:15px; padding-bottom:15px;" /></p>
<p>Alcohol kills approximately <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6089353/ns/health-addictions/t/alcohol-linked-us-deaths-year/#.TykPMiMU5UM" target="_blank">70,000 people</a> per year. Prescription pills, which have helped overdose become the leading cause of accidental death in America, result in <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6043a4.htm" target="_blank">more than 20,000 deaths per year</a>. Marijuana has never killed anybody.</p>
<p>Although scientific research is available to show that pot is relatively harmless, and in fact medically beneficial, myths and propaganda about the plant’s alleged harm lead to marijuana laws so severe they often have the unintended consequence of driving people to drink alcohol, a much more dangerous substance than pot.</p>
<p>Many people do not understand just how harsh some marijuana legislation is. In America, pot possession so minor it is not even a misdemeanor can cause caring parents to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/18/nyregion/parents-minor-marijuana-arrests-lead-to-child-neglect-cases.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">lose custody of their children</a>, because welfare offices may charge them with neglect, regardless of how good a parent they are. The legal ramifications of pot use may make parents who want to smoke marijuana more likely to drink alcohol, which is much more likely to create abusive or otherwise harmful behavior.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Jail time is another, more obvious consequence of pot use that may drive some people to drink. Last spring in Oklahoma, legislators <a href="http://www.alternet.org/drugs/150935/the_5_worst_states_to_get_busted_with_pot?page=entire" target="_blank">voted in favor of House Bill 1798</a>, enforcing a mandatory minimum of two years in jail and maximum penalty of life in prison for manufacturing hash. This is despite the fact that in Oklahoma, state law already allowed judges to <a href="http://www.alternet.org/drugs/150935/the_5_worst_states_to_get_busted_with_pot?page=entire" target="_blank">sentence pot growers to life in prison</a>.<br /></p>
<p>What's more, pot convictions can take away scholarships, food stamps, welfare, and public housing. Depriving a pot smoker of access to public assistance and housing while undermining his or her educational opportunities, may seem shocking. But politicians are escalating the punitive effort, with many states eager to implement mandatory drug testing for public assistance. Laws like these may well make alcohol a better choice than marijuana, as it does not have the same legal repercussions. Still, its health consequences are much more harmful than pot. Alcoholism not only causes <a href="http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/CancerCauses/DietandPhysicalActivity/alcohol-use-and-cancer" target="_blank">liver and other types of cancers</a>, as well as brain damage, it also increases the risk of death from car crashes and other accidents. And alcohol use is <a href="http://www.ias.org.uk/resources/factsheets/crime.pdf" target="_blank">linked to acts of violence</a> like rape, homicide and suicide.</p>
<p>The health effects of drinking will kill about 30,000 people a year, but another 40,000 people die each year from car crashes and other accidents caused by excessive alcohol consumption. The dangers and death associated with alcohol use become more shocking when we consider how many Americans drink: <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/141656/drinking-rate-edges-slightly-year-high.aspx" target="_blank">67 percent</a> of U.S. adults drink alcohol, and <a href="http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/alcoholism.html" target="_blank">17.6 million adults</a> have drinking problems. Perhaps these numbers would not be so high if people who want to smoke pot were not worried about legal, and other disciplinary, consequences of using.</p>
<p>Aside from tough-on-pot laws, we see so-called pot deterrents regularly in our culture, especially in athletic departments. In some schools, athletes must pass drug tests or get the boot. Disciplinary policies like these can make alcohol the more appealing option.</p>
<p>As Steve Fox, one of the authors of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Marijuana-Safer-Driving-People-Drink/dp/1603581448" target="_blank"><i>Marijuana is Safer: So Why Are We Driving People to Drink?</i></a>, told AlterNet:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>“[M]arijuana laws, drug testing and societal pressures most definitely steer people toward alcohol every single day. Let's take one simple example. The National Football League, which inundates society with advertisements encouraging alcohol use, bans the use of marijuana among its players. In fact, it just suspended two players for marijuana use, include one player, Trent Williams, who lost $1.85 million as the result of his four-game suspension. A nearly $2 million penalty for getting high! So what will Trent Williams do the next time he wants to chill with his friends? Smoke marijuana or drink alcohol?”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A recent <a href="http://monitoringthefuture.org/" target="_blank">NIDA study</a> on teen substance youth offers an example of how marijuana and alcohol use negatively correlate. The survey found that teenagers are increasingly using marijuana, and decreasing their alcohol and cigarette use, at the same time that fewer teens view marijuana as harmful. The study's authors suggest that the increase in pot use, if related to a dwindling belief that pot is bad, may be linked to "the debate over medical marijuana." In other words, teens may be increasingly hearing the medical benefits and relative harmlessness of pot and making decisions less likely to harm themselves. This should be good news.</p>
<p>As Fox told AlterNet,</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>“There are three choices for teens: drunk, high and sober. Of course, we hope they all choose to be sober, but that is not realistic. The best we can do for teens is to provide them with honest information and encourage them to be sober while their brains develop. But a campaign that only discusses -- and exaggerates -- the harms of marijuana will likely have the effect of steering teens toward alcohol use instead. Do we really want that outcome? Why? If we as a society cannot accept the fact that marijuana is less dangerous for teens than alcohol, then we aren't really addressing the issue at all.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But some people believe that an increase in marijuana use -- even when possibly contributing to a decrease in alcohol use -- is negative. Part of why some people cannot see how reducing alcohol consumption reduces harm, and why the laws that discourage pot use are so harsh, is because myths about pot's so-called danger remain rampant. Many Americans still believe that pot and alcohol are similarly harmful, and that legalizing marijuana may only create another American vice.</p>
<p>“This perception is wrong,” Mason Tvert, co-author of <i>Marijuana is Safer</i>, <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/07/23/driven-to-drink-by-marijuana-laws/" target="_blank">told Reuters</a>, “and it can’t be corrected overnight. What we aim for is legislation that would give adults the choice between alcohol and a less harmful alternative. Current laws steer people toward alcohol because they fear the consequences of being caught using marijuana. But I think we are nearing a tipping point.”</p>
<p>To change the laws or provide youths, and adults, with the tools to make smarter decisions, accurate information must replace propaganda. As Fox explained to me:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>“There is no way to ensure teen safety. The best we can do is diminish the likelihood of negative outcomes. One way to achieve this goal is to educate teens about the actual harms of intoxicating substances....Every teen should know that drinking too much alcohol could result in a fatal overdose. They must be careful. Drinking games sound fun, but they can literally be deadly. Of course, one cannot die from using too much marijuana. These two facts need not be conveyed at the same time. But this is just an example of the kind of honest information teens need.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There are facts about pot that need to be communicated and repeated over and over. If fully understood, this information would help achieve reform of marijuana laws, and possibly have the long-term effect of not driving people to drink.</p>
<p><b>1. Marijuana is not a gateway drug.</b></p>
<p>"It's a gateway drug" is an argument that anti-pot people often use when they run out of false health concerns, as if marijuana's relative harmlessness is void because getting stoned will automatically turn people on to heroin. But the truth is that marijuana is not a gateway drug, and the vast majority of people who smoke pot will never move onto harder drugs. In 2009, 2.3 million people reported trying pot, but only 617,000 said they had tried cocaine, and just 180,000 said they had tried heroin.</p>
<p>Multiple studies have failed to prove that marijuana is more of a gateway drug than other substances like cigarettes, alcohol or prescription drugs. But we’ve known this since as far as back as 1999, when government researchers said, “There is no conclusive evidence that the drug effects of marijuana are causally linked to the subsequent abuse of other illicit drugs.” Pot and other drug use can correlate, but not necessarily due to characteristics of pot itself, but something more powerful.</p>
<p>As Maia Szalavitz wrote in Time,</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>“People who are extremely interested in altering their consciousness are likely to want to try more than one way of doing it. If you are a true music fan, you probably won’t stick to listening to just one band or even a single genre — this doesn’t make lullabies a gateway to the Grateful Dead, it means that people who really like music probably like many different songs and groups.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While pot is not a gateway drug, pot laws may very well be a gateway to alcohol use, as people who fear the law may turn to booze. And for those who choose to use pot even though it is illegal, pot’s criminal status may nudge them closer to criminals, by putting them in contact with dealers.</p>
<p><b>2. Pot smoke is relatively benign and does not cause lung cancer.</b></p>
<p>The "anything you smoke can't be good" meme helps keep prescription pot stigmatized, and supports pot's classification in the strict drug category Schedule I (with hard drugs like heroin), where substances are said to show lack of safety in use, among other qualifications like lack of medical value.</p>
<p>But a study released earlier this month proved that marijuana is not actually linked to breathing problems. Researchers studied the effects of marijuana smoke on lung function, and found that smoking pot does not cause the same irreversible breathing problems as cigarettes.</p>
<p>This information is not new; multiple studies have concluded that marijuana is not associated with similar health problems. As Paul Armentano, also a co-author of the book <i>Marijuana is Safer</i>, <a href="http://blog.norml.org/2012/01/10/jama-long-term-exposure-to-cannabis-smoke-is-not-associated-with-adverse-effects-on-pulmonary-function/" target="_blank">wrote for NORML</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>“In 2006, the results of the largest case-controlled study ever to investigate the respiratory effects of marijuana smoking reported that cannabis use was not associated with lung-related cancers, even among subjects who reported smoking more than 22,000 joints over their lifetime.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Alcohol, however, is <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/rxbrief/" target="_blank">linked to many cancers</a>, including liver, mouth, throat, and breast cancer.</p>
<p><b>3. Pot does not cause schizophrenia.</b></p>
<p>Many drug war advocates allege that marijuana use causes schizophrenia or other mental health problems, but science continually shows otherwise.</p>
<p>A study led by Dr. Serge Sevy, an associate professor of psychiatry at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2005559,00.html" target="_blank">found</a> that controlling for factors known to increase schizophrenia risk eliminated the association between disease onset and marijuana use.</p>
<p>Steve Fox told AlterNet,</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"These mental health issues are generally as baseless and misleading as past prohibitionist claims, such as the claim that marijuana contains carcinogens that increase the users risk of lung cancer. The truth is that there has never been a documented case of lung cancer among marijuana-only (as opposed to marijuana and tobacco) smokers. Similarly, the rates of schizophrenia in society have not increased as marijuana use has become widespread, as one would expect if marijuana use caused the condition. There may be a correlation between people with mental health issues and marijuana use, but that is far different than causation."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The long-term cognitive effects of marijuana use are difficult to measure, because they are evident during highly demanding brain functions, according to the <a href="http://www.csam-asam.org/adverse-effects-marijuana-healthcare-professionals" target="_blank">California Association of Addiction Medicine</a>. But even the most long-term weed smokers will not face health problems comparable to those linked to long-term alcohol use, which include liver cirrhosis and Korsakoff’s syndrome, a disease that causes debilitating brain damage and the inability to form new memories.</p>
<p>Of course, any substance abuse is potentially more detrimental to a developing brain than to an adult brain. Prevention, or delaying use, is a great way to reduce harm. But prohibition does not guarantee increased safety, especially when alcohol is legal.</p>
<p><b>4. Driving high is not very dangerous.</b></p>
<p>Driving an automobile while high is another example of the fear-mongering used to facilitate harsh pot laws. Jill Cooper, the associate director of the Safe Transportation Research and Education Center at the University of California, Berkeley, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/12/19/should-teenagers-get-high-instead-of-drunk/marijuana-is-unsafe-for-teenage-drivers" target="_blank">argued with good intention in the New York Times</a> that while alcohol is still "a very real threat to teen drivers," an increase in marijuana use also threatens threatens safe driving. She says,</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"We should not feel that teens are safer stoned than drunk. Why would we want anyone with diminished skills, either as a result of cannabis use or alcohol use, operating a machine made of two tons of steel?"</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But her logic is ill-informed. You would be hard pressed to find someone who advocates putting a driver with diminished skills behind the wheel. But marijuana use may actually cause a decrease in traffic fatalities. <a href="http://ftp.iza.org/dp6112.pdf" target="_blank">A study by the Institute for the Study of Labor</a>, a research center for science, politics, and business in Bonn, Germany, showed that in states where medical marijuana is legal, adults were smoking more marijuana and drinking less alcohol, and the result was a 9 percent decrease in traffic fatalities.</p>
<p><a href="http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.source.php?sourceID=011150" target="_blank">Another study</a>, conduced by Andrew Sewell, found that quantity affects ability, but "marijuana smokers tend to compensate effectively while driving by utilizing a variety of behavioral strategies," like driving slower. The study concluded:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>Epidemiological studies have been inconclusive regarding whether cannabis use causes an increased risk of accidents; in contrast, unanimity exists that alcohol use increases crash risk."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mix alcohol and pot together, however, and the effects may be more intoxicating than either drug alone.</p>
<p><b>5. Pot does not make you lazy.</b></p>
<p>You've seen the image a million times: A pothead slumped on the couch surrounded by a cloud of weed smoke, paralyzed by his high. But marijuana is not a couch-potato creator. The technical name for marijuana-induced laziness is "amotivational syndrome," and research suggests it has a lot more to do with other factors than with pot. A study on marijuana use and amotivational syndrome shows circumstances unique to a person, or some underlying problem, are more to blame for amotivational syndrome than the drug itself. Like research on pot and schizophrenia, the challenge is separating pot use from other variables that may take place at the same time, and attributing the correct cause to effect.</p>
<p>But even if marijuana did make people lazy, pot is not associated with violent crime or sexual assault. Alcohol, on the other hand, is a contributing factor in many cases of violence, as well as sexual assault and rape. According to the <a href="http://www.nllea.org/documents/Alcohol_and_Crime.pdf" target="_blank">National Center for Alcohol Law Enforcement</a>:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Almost one in four victims of violent crime report that the perpetrator had been drinking prior to committing the violence.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>Over one-third of victims of rapes or sexual assaults report that the offender was drinking at the time of the act.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>It is estimated that 32 to 50 percent of homicides are preceded by alcohol consumption by the perpetrator.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>Between 31 percent and 36 percent of prisoners convicted of a violent crime against an intimate reported that they were drinking alcohol at the time of the offense.</li>
</ul>
<p>Alcohol is <a href="http://www.saferchoice.org/content/view/24/53/#injuries" target="_blank">linked to</a> reckless behavior and to serious injuries, and it is highly associated with emergency room visits. But marijuana is <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20627209" target="_blank">rarely associated with emergency room visits</a>, and is not proven to increase reckless behavior or <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/40" target="_blank">cause injuries</a>.</p>
<p>As Fox told AlterNet,</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"There are very few things in life that are harmless. We understand that McDonald's, Popeye's and tuna fish, for that matter, pose certain risks to our health. We don't ban all of these things because they are not harmless. When it comes to using a substance for recreation or relaxation, alcohol and marijuana are by far the two most popular choices in our society. In many ways they are quite similar. But the most significant difference is that marijuana is far less harmful to the user. More than 30,000 Americans die every year from the health effects of alcohol. The comparable number for marijuana is zero. If making marijuana legal results in millions of Americans shifting from alcohol consumption to marijuana consumption (at least in part), that will result in less physical harm to Americans and possibly fewer deaths. I will let other people judge whether that is a good thing."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>To reduce the harm associated with substance use, Americans need the options and tools necessary to make health-based, informed decisions -- not harsh consequences that punish a relatively harmless drug.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Psychiatry’s Grand Confession</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2012/01/psychiatrys_grand_confession.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2012:/eng//3.3594</id>

    <published>2012-01-30T09:36:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T14:30:31Z</updated>

    <summary>Mad in America January 23, 2012 by Jonathan Leo, Ph.D. / Jeffrey Lacasse, Ph.D. RSS The psychiatry profession has finally come clean and confessed on a national media outlet that there is no evidence to support the Serotonin Theory of Depression. Today, on NPR’s Morning Edition there is a segment about the chemical imbalance theory, and virtually all the psychiatrists who are interviewed acknowledge that the there was never any evidence in support of the idea that low serotonin causes depression. But then, amazingly, they go on to say that it is perfectly fine to tell patients that serotonin imbalance causes depression even though they know this isn’t the case....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Toni</name>
        <uri>http://www.alfaomegaeditrice.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Junk Science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Psychiatry" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.madinamerica.com" target="_blank">Mad in America</a><br />
January 23, 2012<br />
by Jonathan Leo, Ph.D. / Jeffrey Lacasse, Ph.D. RSS<br />
<br />
<p><br />
<img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201201301031.jpg" width="100" height="132" alt="201201301031.jpg" style="float:left; padding-top:15px; padding-right:15px; padding-bottom:15px;" /></p>
<p>The psychiatry profession has finally come clean and confessed on a national media outlet that there is no evidence to support the Serotonin Theory of Depression. Today, on NPR’s Morning Edition <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/01/23/145525853/when-it-comes-to-depression-serotonin-isnt-the-whole-story" target="_blank">there is a segment</a> about the chemical imbalance theory, and virtually all the psychiatrists who are interviewed acknowledge that the there was never any evidence in support of the idea that low serotonin <i>causes</i> depression. But then, amazingly, they go on to say that it is perfectly fine to tell patients that serotonin imbalance causes depression even though they know this isn’t the case.</p>
<p>Several years ago in <i>PLoS Medicine</i> we wrote a <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020392" target="_blank">long piece</a> about the serotonin theory and the disconnect between what research psychiatrists say in professional journals and textbooks and what the advertisements say. While the advertisements presented the theory as scientific fact, the scientific sources clearly did not. Given the enormous <a href="http://www.telospress.com/main/index.php?main_page=news_article&amp;article_id=334" target="_blank">marketing programs that pushed</a> this theory combined with the media’s lack of skepticism, we were sympathetic to the general public who could hardly be faulted for thinking that theory had some foundation in fact. Following the publication of our piece a reporter contacted us and suggested that we were attacking a well accepted theory. We pointed out to the reporter that we weren’t attacking a sacred cow but that instead we were pointing out the mainstream psychiatry didn’t even accept this theory. We urged the reporter to contact the FDA, NIMH, APA, etc and ask them about the science behind the advertisements. He did, and as expected, an expert from the FDA explained that the theory was <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18825252.500" target="_blank">really just a metaphor</a>. The problem is that patients who heard their physician explain the serotonin theory thought they were hearing real science. They weren’t told it was a metaphor and hence thought it was a fact. When a doctor talks about high cholesterol, diabetes, or hypothyroidism, they are talking about scientific measurement, not a metaphor. How is a patient with high cholesterol and depression who listens to their doctor’s explanation of their conditions supposed to know when the doctor has moved from science to metaphor?</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Several months ago Ronald Pies published an <a href="https://member.cmpmedica.com/index.php?referrer=http://member.cmpmedica.com/cga.php?assetID=422&amp;referrer=http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/blog/couchincrisis/content/article/10168/1902106" target="_blank">interesting article</a> in <i>Psychiatric Times</i> entitled, “Psychiatry’s New Brain-Mind and the Legend of the Chemical Imbalance.” Pies, just like the experts on NPR, acknowledges that the Chemical Imbalance theory is not true. However, according to Pies, it was the pharmaceutical companies who espoused the theory, and not well-informed, practicing clinicians, because the psychiatry community has known all along that the theory is not true.<br /></p>
<p>But if the Psychiatry Community knew all along that the theory was not true, then why did they not clarify this issue for the general public? Shouldn’t they have pointed out to the general public and patients that what the pharmaceutical companies were saying about psychological stress was not true? Why did the professional societies not publicly set the record straight?</p>
<p>There are many angry comments on the NPR website. These comments are interesting, because apparently many patients who were told that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance never understood that were hearing a metaphor and not science. Since the chemical imbalance theory is often presented as a rationale for taking SSRIs, such patients now understandably feel lied to by their clinicians.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most interesting part about the NPR piece is that the reporter seems to not understand that the idea of telling a falsehood to patients because you think it is good for them is a serious violation of informed consent. Shouldn’t the reporter have asked the obvious questions, such as:</p>
<p>1) Do you feel it is acceptable to present a scientific theory as fact even though you know it is false?</p>
<p>2) Is it okay for psychiatrists to tell patients stories about their conditions that psychiatrists know are false?</p>
<p>3) Is there not an ethical issue when a psychiatrist informs their patient that they have a serotonin imbalance, when the medical textbooks on the shelf clearly say this is a falsified theory?</p>
<p>In general, we are fans of NPR, but hopefully the next news outlet that covers this topic will be more investigative in their approach.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Thousands of women could be at risk from &apos;silent Thalidomide&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2012/01/thousands_of_women_could_be_at_risk_from_silent_thalidomide.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2012:/eng//3.3593</id>

    <published>2012-01-26T08:48:08Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T16:17:16Z</updated>

    <summary>The Independent 22 January 2012 By Sarah Morrison and Jaymi McCann A drug intended to prevent miscarriage is blamed for causing cancer in the daughters – and possibly even granddaughters – of women who took it decades ago. Tens of thousands of British families are to be asked if they are victims of a drug given to pregnant women which can cause fatal illness in the second, and possibly even third, generations. Some women given the drug in this country have already obtained compensation in America. Diethylstilboestrol (DES), a drug given to women for 30 years up to 1973, has been found to cause a rare form of vaginal and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Toni</name>
        <uri>http://www.alfaomegaeditrice.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Cancer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Junk Science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Legislation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Toxic substances" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk">The Independent</a><br />
22 January 2012<br />
By Sarah Morrison and Jaymi McCann<br />
<p><b>A drug intended to prevent miscarriage is blamed for causing cancer in the daughters – and possibly even granddaughters – of women who took it decades ago.</b></p>
<p><img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201201260942.jpg" width="380" height="285" alt="201201260942.jpg" style="padding-top:10px; padding-bottom:10px;" /><br /></p>
<p>Tens of thousands of British families are to be asked if they are victims of a drug given to pregnant women which can cause fatal illness in the second, and possibly even third, generations. Some women given the drug in this country have already obtained compensation in America.<br /></p>
<p>Diethylstilboestrol (DES), a drug given to women for 30 years up to 1973, has been found to cause a rare form of vaginal and cervical cancer in some of the daughters of the women who took it, as well as fertility problems. Compensation of an estimated $1.5bn has been paid out in the US. There is even a suspicion that DES – known as the "silent Thalidomide" – can affect the grandchildren of those who took it.</p>
<p>Legal action against the 14 different drug companies that sold and promoted DES from the early 1940s to 1970s is being brought by at least 80 women in the US, who all believe that the synthetic form of oestrogen, given to their mothers in an effort to reduce miscarriages, caused them to develop breast cancer years later. Their lawyer, Aaron Levine, will travel to the UK in two weeks' time to co-ordinate a hunt for the "DES daughters" in this country who have been unable to get compensation in British courts.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The saga surrounding DES, developed in England in 1938, began when it was prescribed to millions of women in the US, Australia and Europe, despite the fact that research published in the American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology in 1953 revealed that women receiving it suffered a higher rate of miscarriage. In 1971, the US Food and Drug Administration told doctors to stop prescribing DES when it was discovered that one in 1,000 daughters of women who had taken it developed a rare form of vaginal and cervical cancer, known as clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCAC).<br /></p>
<p>Mr Levine, a Washington DC lawyer who is representing all 80 women in the US, told The Independent on Sunday that the prescription of the controversial drug was "quackery". "It never worked. It was like leeches or bleeding or copper rings," he said. "It didn't do anything positive for anyone, and didn't help anyone's pregnancy. What is striking is that it was banned in 1971 here [in the US], but that it continued to be sold years later in the UK."</p>
<p>The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology estimates that 7,500 women in the UK were given the drug and 3,500 exposed girls were born between 1940 and 1971, but this is believed by many to be a gross underestimate. Other reports estimate that up to 300,000 people in Britain were exposed, but no source can confirm this figure. Some children will be unaware if their mother took DES during her pregnancy, especially as some of those who took it have since died.</p>
<p>The "children" that do know, most aged between 35 and 65, are not only concerned about their own health, but also that of their children. Research into the effects of DES exposure on the third generation is in early stages, but studies done on rodents suggest the drug can cause DNA changes in women that can be passed from generation to generation. It was not until 1973 that UK doctors were advised against prescribing the drug.</p>
<p>Janet Hall, 61, from Bournemouth, did not find out she had been exposed to DES until her mother died at 32 from lung cancer. At 20, Ms Hall had to undergo surgery to remove a large part of her cervix, she believes as a result of DES exposure. After one miscarriage she had two daughters, but says both are now showing similar symptoms. Her youngest, Hannah, 26, has pre-cancerous cells in her cervix, but she says the NHS refused to let her undergo a check until last year. "I feel guilty for my girls even though I didn't know [about DES] when they were born," Mrs Hall said. "It messes with your mind; it makes you ask why you had to have children."</p>
<p>Dr Julie Palmer, professor of epidemiology at Boston University's school of public health, who is leading a study on the effects of DES exposure in second and third generations, said she does not think we have uncovered all the side effects of this drug. "Women who took it were given very big doses. They often took one pill every day, all the way through their pregnancy – sometimes a week before their due date," she said.</p>
<p>All DES daughters carry a lifelong risk of CCAC and are 40 times more likely to develop it than unexposed women. Most cases have occurred in women in their late teens and early twenties, and it is estimated that at least 25 per cent of those diagnosed died from the illness. But this is only one of a rapidly increasing list of side effects. According to a recent study, led by Dr Robert Hoover at America's National Cancer Institute, breast cancer risk is nearly doubled in DES daughters over the age of 40, with women recording a one-in-25 chance of developing the disease by 55.</p>
<p>Arline MacCormack, 50, from Massachusetts, first heard about DES from her mother when she was 17. She believes that DES prescribed to her mother before she was born caused her to develop breast cancer when she was 44. "The characteristics of my cancer were for women over 60 typically. It wasn't the type of cancer a 44-year-old woman gets," she said. Her case is scheduled for mediation.</p>
<p>Several studies have found increased risks of premature birth, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy associated with drug exposure, while "DES sons" run a higher risk of genital problems, such as undescended testicles, cysts on the back of the testes and lowered sperm count. The UK brand Apstil is still authorised in the UK, but only for the treatment of prostate cancer and metastatic breast cancer in post-menopausal women.</p>
<p>The first recorded "DES daughter" in Britain, Heather Justice, 59, from Jarrow, was 25 when she found out she had vaginal cancer and would have to undergo a hysterectomy and partial vaginectomy. Although she found records showing her mother had been given DES in the 1950s, she was unable to bring a case to court because she could not identify which manufacturer had produced the drug. After years of fighting the legal system, she says she feels disillusioned.</p>
<p>"One of the problems is that unlike Thalidomide, where you see the problem the minute the baby was born, women who took DES had healthy babies," she says. "Problems were hidden until the teens and twenties, by which point we were forgotten about. When I asked my mum what she had taken, she didn't even remember the name of the stuff. It is a complete and utter minefield."</p>
<p>While an estimated 2,000 cases have been bought against drug companies in America, with Mr Levine securing more than $100m in out-of-court settlements, there are no records of compensation being won in UK courts. Sallie Booth, a solicitor at Irwin Mitchell who spent years looking into DES exposure cases in this country, said: "It is fraught with difficulty in this jurisdiction. People can't remember which brand they took 40-odd years ago and there were over 200 named DES drugs in circulation."</p>
<p>But not all want compensation. For Mrs Hall and many other DES daughters, it has always been about raising awareness for those who were exposed and providing proper testing to reduce chances of getting cancer. They also want the Government to fund scientific studies for the third generation. MP David Blunkett, who bought up the issue when he was shadow Health Secretary 19 years ago, said he "deeply regret[s]" that in the "intervening time those concerned still feel that their concerns have not been addressed or redress provided".</p>
<p>Andy SlaughterMP said that the UK has a "way of burying our mistakes". He added: "People caricature those in the compensation culture as 'ambulance chasers,' but then we have a case like this, where it really is impossible for people to get redress for what is really a horrific injury they have suffered." He added that it might be possible for those affected to sue the NHS directly.</p>
<p>A Department of Health spokesperson said the issue was "complex" and the department has "every sympathy" for those who believe they had been affected. But she added: "With regard to compensation for people who believe they have been adversely affected by this drug, this is a matter for the manufacturer(s) and/or the UK licensees of the drug."</p>
<p>The latest American case is thought to be the first major lawsuit alleging a link between DES and breast cancer in DES daughters over 40. Last week, Judge Marianne Bowler denied a motion by the drug companies to block the first 53 women, exposed to DES more than 40 years ago, from proceeding with their case. Mr Levine said he was confident that if he could find British lawyers willing to take on the case, they would have a good case against companies in the UK.</p>
<p>His American lawsuit alleges that the 14 American drug manufacturers suppressed certain information about DES from doctors and FDA reports that questioned the safety of the drug. The IoS contacted lawyers and representatives from all 14 companies, but they all either refused to comment or denied any causal link between DES and breast cancer. "We believe these claims are without merit and are prepared to defend against them vigorously," said an Eli Lilly spokesperson.</p>
<p>Julie Oliver-Zhang, an attorney working with Mr Levine on the case, said it was just her and him against 25 lawyers on behalf of the drug companies. "It is a David vs Goliath battle in the most basic sense," she said.</p>
<p><b>Case study: Michelle Cowen, 60, West London</b></p>
<p><i>Michelle Cowen found out she had been exposed to DES after suffering a miscarriage and an ectopic pregnancy. Mrs Cowen and her husband have never been able to have children as a result of her misshapen fallopian tubes and uterus. She had an oesophagectomy after a tumour was found in her stomach, which she believes could have been caused by exposure. She said what we know about DES is just the "tip of the iceberg".</i></p>
<p>"My husband and I tried to have children ever since we got married in 1972; it was a hopeless task. Finding out we couldn't was quite a terrible experience. [DES daughters] want an acknowledgement that something terrible has gone wrong so that drug companies are better regulated. If what I've got now is down to DES, then there will be other people like me.</p>
<p>"I have two friends who both told me they took DES and now their daughters have symptoms, but they haven't told them because they are frightened. These children are in their forties. I know a woman whose mother saw the same gynaecologist as mine. She was exposed, but wasn't told. That is just three people I know. Look at what the Dutch have done: they gave out compensation and set up clinics. It is unbelievable that we are not talking about that in this country."</p>
<p><b>Case study: Dominique Albert, 40, Bristol</b></p>
<p><i>Dominique Albert lives with her husband Dom and her three daughters, aged between three and eight, in Bristol. She discovered that she was exposed to DES when she was 13 years old and found out she had a T-shaped uterus when she miscarried 11 years ago. After being refused surgery by the NHS, she returned to France for surgery.</i></p>
<p>"It is really tiring to have to educate GPs when they should be the ones telling you they will take care of you. When you have to convince them, it makes you feel paranoid. There needs to be more awareness. It has been a battle for me; DES daughters are at risk of [breast] cancer over 40, yet my GP said I can't have regular breast examinations because I am not 50. It means I'll have to pay for it.</p>
<p>"There are definitely women who don't know their mum even took the drug. That's the main issue in the UK, because they may be infertile or have breast cancer without knowing it is because of DES. My mum really blamed herself, but it will be worse for me. My mum didn't know what it could do when she took it, but when I had my children, I knew there were some concerns for the third generation. I'm sure many women will make that decision. If my daughters get ill, I'll definitely feel guilty, but I don't want to be a victim of it. It can't rule my life."</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Isn&apos;t It Time to Occupy Big Medicine?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2012/01/isnt_it_time_to_occupy_big_medicine.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2012:/eng//3.3592</id>

    <published>2012-01-25T13:46:01Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T17:46:20Z</updated>

    <summary>Huffington Post January 24, 2012 Larry Malerba, D.O. With all the buzz surrounding the specter of cataclysmic change that may soon be upon us as the Mayan calendar comes to an end in December, it&apos;s a good time to take stock of life here on planet Earth. While doomsday predictions will no doubt garner much of the attention from the mainstream media, I don&apos;t plan on building a fallout shelter or taking any other extreme precautions for that matter. Nevertheless, there are big changes coming and I do believe that it is possible to discern the outlines of a new cultural paradigm that has been slowly taking shape for quite...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Toni</name>
        <uri>http://www.alfaomegaeditrice.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Junk Science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Legislation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Medicine Alternatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Nutrition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Privacy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com">Huffington Post</a><br />
January 24, 2012<br />
Larry Malerba, D.O.<br />
<br />
<br />
<p>With all the buzz surrounding the specter of cataclysmic change that may soon be upon us as the Mayan calendar comes to an end in December, it's a good time to take stock of life here on planet Earth. While doomsday predictions will no doubt garner much of the attention from the mainstream media, I don't plan on building a fallout shelter or taking any other extreme precautions for that matter. Nevertheless, there are big changes coming and I do believe that it is possible to discern the outlines of a new cultural paradigm that has been slowly taking shape for quite some time. What it holds in store for medicine should be of interest to us all.</p>
<p>On a global scale, signs of the shift are already evident. In just a short span of time we have witnessed floods, tsunamis, earthquakes, melting polar ice caps, the Fukushima disaster, and dramatic changes in weather patterns. In socioeconomic and geopolitical terms, we have seen the fall of the Twin Towers, the Wall Street financial meltdown, the burst of the housing bubble, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the European monetary crisis, and an ever-widening income gap between the haves and have-nots.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>On a more positive note, we have also seen sweeping changes in the ethnic diversity of America, election of the first black American president, positive gains in terms of LGBT rights, powerful calls for democratic change represented by the Arab Spring, and the rise of the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street movements. The issues of personal freedom, respect for differences, and the right to truly pursue life, liberty, and happiness that were swept in with the sixties generation are making their way to the cultural forefront once again.<br /></p>
<p>Although freedom of expression, economic prosperity, and basic human rights are benefits that many have come to enjoy, there are many others who have been left behind. America's remarkable coming of age and rise to power has a very dark side to it and comes at great expense to our collective well-being. The pendulum has swung far in the direction of economic and cultural imperialism, militarism under the guise of peacekeeping, and unprecedented materialism and consumerism. We are now reaping the harvest of the long-term and unapologetic exploitation of resources and people both here and abroad.</p>
<p>At the root of it all may be an economic philosophy that condones and even encourages the runaway growth of corporate abuse, power, and control at the expense of individual considerations. And the Supreme Court's ruling on the Citizen's United case, which gave personhood status to corporations, may be the straw that has broken the camel's back. Government is broken and it has sold its soul to corporate interests. Perhaps the greatest long-term impact of corporate influence has been the persistent and insidious homogenization, commodification, and commercialization of American culture, accompanied by the soul-deadening depersonalization that goes hand-in-hand with these trends. People everywhere are feeling the impact of these influences in their daily lives, whether they can identify it as such or not.</p>
<p>It has taken the severe hardship that accompanies unemployment, losing one's home, and being unable to afford basic health care in time of need, to waken the commercially pacified public from their material comfort and political apathy. They have woken to an America where they find that the corporate fox is guarding the henhouse. It seems that 2012 may well set the stage for an epic struggle between the American people's best and worst impulses. Their fear and blind rage have spawned a variety of reactions, both negative and positive -- from a call to eliminate most if not all government, blaming America's woes on immigrants, and a return to fundamentalist religious intolerance -- to a recognition that basic democratic principles have been eroded by a relative few with too much power, wealth, and control.</p>
<p>Those who wish to maintain the status quo are inclined to distort the Occupy movement's message as a call for the redistribution of wealth, as if to imply that Occupy supporters are anti-capitalist. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth. But the movement is a call for greater fairness and the leveling of a playing field that has been tilted in favor of those already in control for quite some time now. People are not demanding that the wealthy hand over the goods as much as they are fed up with being gouged and manipulated at every turn by forces that they cannot control.</p>
<p>My own personal concern here is with an issue that I hold dear to me -- health care. The medical establishment has become but a reflection of corporate culture with its caste system of privilege, indifference to the poor, and enslavement to corporate product and profit. The stranglehold of Pharma, the insurance and health maintenance middlemen, and a few powerful entities like the FDA, AMA, and a few elite medical journals has created an oppressive environment of intolerance that stifles creativity and crushes dissent. It should not be surprising, and it is only fitting, that a consumer culture would adopt such a commercial form of medicine. In a world full of exciting medical alternatives -- many of which are cheaper, safer, and often more effective -- the only criteria that seems to meet establishment standards for a viable therapy is that it come in the form of a synthetic and often toxic chemical pill manufactured by an unscrupulous pharmaceutical behemoth.</p>
<p>Despite overwhelming patient satisfaction and clinical evidence in support of alternative therapies such as acupuncture, Ayurveda, homeopathy, Chinese medicine, herbal medicine, chiropractic, nutrition, and energy healing, to name just a few, organized medicine tends to dismiss these options as unproven, pseudoscientific practices. Furthermore, mainstream medicine has been known to muster up the audacity to accuse alternative practitioners of attempting to rip off the public -- as if conventional medicine could never be accused of the same. And the irony is that the whole rotten enterprise hides behind the authority of "science" whenever the madness of its methods are questioned. Never mind that one medical study commonly contradicts another, and that medical research is riddled with conflict of interest, cover-ups, and the manipulation of data to conform to desired outcomes.</p>
<p>The medical establishment rewards conformity, enslaves doctor and patient alike by restricting choice and mandating certain practices, and uses supposedly private patient information to threaten job loss, school expulsion, and discontinuation of medical services if patients do not act in accordance with medicine's arbitrary and capricious rules. Relentless fear-based propaganda is designed to convince us that we will die if we don't take cholesterol drugs, be forever unhappy if we don't take antidepressants, fall down and break our bones without drugs to prevent osteoporosis, and lose our manhood if we don't use erectile dysfunction pills. The masses are treated as guinea pigs for an endless string of dangerous and unproven drugs, vaccines, and procedures many of which are withdrawn from the market only after the casualties have mounted to a point where they can no longer be ignored. Do we really need to ask who benefits from this unconscionable merchandising of medicine?</p>
<p>And so I say to you, isn't it also time for an Occupy Big Medicine movement? The basic principles behind these unsettling cultural, economic, and governmental trends are the very same ones that have corrupted medicine: concentration of wealth, the erosion of basic freedoms, authoritarian responses to dissent, and the institutional denial of ethical and moral responsibility. The counterbalance to this trend can only be found in personal autonomy, self-education, the courage to go against the grain, and the will to resist authoritarian impulses. It also requires an unflinching belief in the right to personal medical freedom with an understanding that, unlike what medical science would have us believe, there is rarely only one correct medical choice to any given health problem. There are many more solutions that medicine is willing to acknowledge.</p>
<p>If we truly respect democratic principles, then we understand that there are no right or wrong medical choices -- there are only personal choices. A deep respect for the diversity of medical practices and opinions is of paramount importance. But with this comes the need to accept personal responsibility for the choices we make rather than blaming the medical direction that we have chosen. Human health and healing can be mysterious and unpredictable, and, so, the general public must not fall for the illusion of medicine as a hard science. Although certain therapeutic options may be preferable to others in particular situations, there is no guaranteed, foolproof road to a satisfactory medical outcome.</p>
<p>Are corporations and corporate medicine inherently evil? No, but when corporate interests come before the people that they employ and serve, it ultimately does harm to everyone. The internet has become the great equalizer by virtue of its unfettered flow of information and because it provides people with common interests a way to communicate with one another -- and even that liberty is now being threatened by corporate greed. The Internet will play a crucial role in reclaiming our medical rights to privacy, choice, and basic affordable health care for all.</p>
<p>A swing of the pendulum usually generates an equal and opposite reaction, and with change often comes conflict. As the old medical paradigm informed by its materialistic, reductionist, survival of the fittest worldview resists, a new, greener, more holistic, person-oriented approach that understands the irreducible unity of body, mind, and spirit stands ready to demand its rightful place in history. It will not require the overthrow of the special interests of the old medical order as much as a recognition that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Corporate medicine that places profit ahead of people is no longer tenable. Slick advertising and cute slogans that pander to holism won't cut it either.</p>
<p>The new medical paradigm will include a place for everyone. No one will be excluded. We need massage therapists, integrative medicine practitioners, and spiritual healers just as much as we need gynecologists, endocrinologists, and surgeons. We are the owners of our own health, not the corporate-medical-industrial complex. We must reclaim our rights to privacy, our fundamental right to make choices without being hounded by medical big brother, and our personal medical autonomy.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Fluoride Linked to #1 Cause of Death in New Research</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2012/01/fluoride_linked_to_1_cause_of_death_in_new_research.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2012:/eng//3.3591</id>

    <published>2012-01-18T13:49:50Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T15:56:30Z</updated>

    <summary>NaturalSociety.com Anthony Gucciardi January 17, 2012 Groundbreaking new research has linked sodium fluoride to cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. Researchers found that fluoride consumption directly stimulates the hardening of your arteries, a condition known as atherosclerosis that is highly correlated with the #1 killer. Sodium fluoride is currently added to the water supply of many cities worldwide, despite extreme opposition from health professionals and previous studies linking it to decreased IQ and infertility. In their research, scientists examined the relationship between fluoride intake and the hardening (calcification) of the arteries. Studying more than 60 patients, the researchers found a significant correlation between fluoride consumption and the calcification...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>sal</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Fluoride" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Toxic substances" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://naturalsociety.com/breaking-fluoride-linked-to-1-cause-of-death-in-new-research/" target="_blank">NaturalSociety.com</a><br />
Anthony Gucciardi<br />
January 17, 2012<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201201181433.jpg" width="210" height="131" alt="201201181433.jpg" style="float:left; padding-top:10px; padding-right:15px; padding-bottom:10px;" />Groundbreaking new research has linked sodium fluoride to cardiovascular disease, <b>the leading cause of death worldwide</b>. Researchers found that fluoride consumption directly <b>stimulates the hardening of your arteries</b>, a condition known as atherosclerosis that is <i>highly correlated</i> with the #1 killer. Sodium fluoride is currently added to the water supply of many cities worldwide, despite extreme opposition from health professionals and previous studies <a href="http://naturalsociety.com/your-drinking-water-may-be-lowering-your-iq-giving-you-cancer/" target="_blank">linking it to decreased</a> IQ and infertility.

<p>In their research, scientists examined the relationship between fluoride intake and the hardening (calcification) of the arteries. Studying more than 60 patients, the researchers found a <i>significant correlation</i> between fluoride consumption and the calcification of your arteries. Published in the January edition of the journal Nuclear Medicine Communications, <a href="http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/there-association-vascular-fluoride-uptake-vascular-calcification-and-coronary-artery-diseas" target="_blank">the research</a> highlights the fact that <b>mass fluoride exposure may be to blame for the cardiovascular disease epidemic</b> that takes more lives each year than cancer. In 2008, cardiovascular <b>killed 17 million people.</b></p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>According to the authors of the study:<br /></p>
<p>“The coronary fluoride uptake value in patients with cardiovascular events was significantly higher than in patients without cardiovascular events.”</p>
<p>Amazingly, this is not the first report to come out on the dangers of water fluoridation, however the United States government along with other nations have allowed for the continued fluoridation of the public water supply despite these key findings. In fact, the <a href="http://naturalsociety.com/water-fluoridation-war-government-admit-dangers-experts-speak-ou/" target="_blank">U.S. government has even gone on record</a> stating that a reduction in water fluoridation needs to occur following the results of a massive study that found water fluoridation affected cognitive function to the point of lowering the IQ of children. It turns out that the announcement was little more than a public relations stunt to curtail the massive wave of activism that followed the findings.</p>
<p>Government Admits Dangers Yet Continues to Pump Fluoride Into Your Water Supply</p>
<p>Over 24 other studies have unanimously concluded that fluoride negatively impacts cognitive function. In addition to these 24 studies focusing on cognition, over 100 animal studies have linked fluoride to an increase in male infertility, diabetes, and a whole host of other health problems. In the latest study on cognition, it was found that that 28% of the children who lived in an area where fluoride levels were low achieved the highest test scores. This means that the children exposed to less fluoride scored normal or advanced, while only 8% of fluoridated children did the same.</p>
<p>In fact, the <a href="http://www.cbwinfo.com/Chemical/Precursors/p42.html" target="_blank">safety precautions regarding sodium fluoride</a> are quite telling themselves:</p>
<p>Risk and Safety Phrases.</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>R25 – Toxic if swallowed.</p>

  <p>R32 – Contact with acid liberates very toxic gas.</p>

  <p>R36/38 – Irritating to skin and eyes.</p>

  <p>S1/2 – Keep locked up and out of reach of children.</p>

  <p>S22 – Do not breathe dust.</p>

  <p>S36 – Wear suitable protective clothing.</p>

  <p>S45 - In case of accident or if you feel unwell, seek medical advice immediately (show the label whenever possible.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But what about cavity prevention?</p>
<p>Since 1962 the government has recommended fluoride levels between 0.7 and 1.2 milligrams per liter in the nations drinking water. Toted as an excellent cavity blocker, fluoride has been praised for its alleged power to prevent tooth decay and boost oral health. Research has now revealed that fluoride, the very substance that is supposed to prevent tooth decay, actually does nothing to prevent <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/ontario-fluoride-may-make-minor-difference/article1535873/" target="_blank">against cavities</a>. In fact, <a href="http://naturalsociety.com/the-powers-of-vitamin-d/" target="_blank">vitamin D</a> has been found to be <a href="http://naturalsociety.com/vitamin-d-better-than-fluoride-at-cavity-prevention/" target="_blank">significantly more effective</a> in cavity prevention without the extreme side effects. Instead of damaging your body, vitamin D slashes your risk of just about everything fluoride consumption causes.</p>
<p>According to the latest numbers, over 72 percent of Americans drink water treated with fluoride. Is it any wonder that cardiovascular disease rates are off the charts? Perhaps most concerning is the fact that fluoride does not even prevent cavities, which is the very reason legislators have pushed to keep it in the public water supply despite the links to deadly disease. Even if fluoride was found to prevent cavities, would it be worth the adverse effects?</p>
<p>Fluoride should be completely removed from the international water supply as it is a threat to public health. Until the proper legislation is passed, acquiring a high-quality water filter that removes fluoride is vital for the health perseverance of you and your family.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>14 new side effects found of widely prescribed swine flu drug Tamiflu</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2012/01/14_new_side_effects_found_of_widely_prescribed_swine_flu_drug_tamiflu.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2012:/eng//3.3590</id>

    <published>2012-01-17T09:11:13Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T16:49:57Z</updated>

    <summary>ZeeNews.comJanuary 15, 2012 London: Thousands of people in Britain who took Tamiflu during the swine flu pandemic may have suffered a string of side-effects they were not warned about, it has been revealed. 14 new adverse reactions were added to the drug’s profile in November – more than two years after the scare. Among the conditions are back, joint and muscle aches, fever, menstrual pain, herpes, sinusitis and earache. These revelations come as a team of the world’s leading scientists prepare to release a report about the drug’s safety and effectiveness. The renowned Cochrane Collaboration is set to release its findings on Wednesday and will claim that the drug’s makers,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Toni</name>
        <uri>http://www.alfaomegaeditrice.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bird Flu - SARS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Money" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Swine flu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Toxic substances" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://zeenews.india.com" target="_blank">ZeeNews.com<br /></a>January 15, 2012</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p><br />
<img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201201170945.jpg" width="256" height="140" alt="201201170945.jpg" style="float:left; padding-top:17px; padding-right:15px; padding-bottom:10px;" /></p>
<p>London: Thousands of people in Britain who took Tamiflu during the swine flu pandemic may have suffered a string of side-effects they were not warned about, it has been revealed.</p>
<p>14 new adverse reactions were added to the drug’s profile in November – more than two years after the scare.</p>
<p>Among the conditions are back, joint and muscle aches, fever, menstrual pain, herpes, sinusitis and earache.</p>
<p>These revelations come as a team of the world’s leading scientists prepare to release a report about the drug’s safety and effectiveness.</p>
<p>The renowned Cochrane Collaboration is set to release its findings on Wednesday and will claim that the drug’s makers, Roche, withheld vital data during its investigation.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Several patients are also said to be preparing legal action after suffering alleged reactions.<br /></p>
<p>The Daily Star revealed that Samantha Millard, 20, from Bicester, Oxon, who was left blind after taking the drug, is suing NHS Direct. Experts believe the legal cases could open the floodgates to more litigation.</p>
<p>But the Department of Health and the MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) say the “potential benefits of the medicine outweigh the potential risks”.</p>
<p>In a letter to GPs the Chief Medical Officer Professor Dame Sally Davies revealed a change in policy this winter to allow healthy people to be prescribed Tamiflu. In 2009 the drug’s use was limited to those with underlying medical conditions.</p>
<p>The MHRA has had 2,084 suspected adverse reactions reported. The drug is being linked to 13 deaths, psychotic episodes, convulsions and suicidal thoughts.</p>
<p>Of the 2,084 reactions there were 219 reports of nervous system disorders. And of the 435 different side effects reported to the MHRA, just 41 were included on the information leaflets with the drug.</p>
<p>The decision to add 14 new side effects was made by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) – in charge of licensing the drug – on November 3.</p>
<p>The EMA said “arthralgia, influenza, back pain, myalgia, dysmenorrhea, pyrexia, herpes simplex, and sinusitis” must be added under “common” side effects.</p>
<p>Following additional clinical data from Roche the EMA also asked for “earache, nasopharyngitis, influenza-like illness, pain in limb, nasal congestion, and sore throat” to also be included.</p>
<p>Roche said all new packs being sent out will include the latest side-effect information.</p>
<p>“The update to the information for Tamiflu was routine and did not change the way this medicine is used,” said the EMA.</p>
<p>“There is inevitably a delay between the decision to update the product information and the time it takes to reach all patients,” it added.</p>
<p>The MHRA also commented on the investigation.</p>
<p>“The discrepancy you noticed during your investigation will be due to leaflets possibly being out of date while stock moves through the supply chain,” said the MHRA.</p>
<p>“This is likely given that the variation to amend the text in the Patient Information Leaflet and Summary of Product Characteristics was granted in November 2011,” it added.</p>
<p>ANI</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Doctor Exposes Fluoride as Poison</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2012/01/doctor_exposes_fluoride_as_poison.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2012:/eng//3.3589</id>

    <published>2012-01-10T11:44:04Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T14:57:00Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Infowars Ireland by ZyPhReX Dec 10, 2011 It is now known – thanks to the meticulous research of Dr. Jennifer Luke from the University of Surrey in England – that the pineal gland is the primary target of fluoride accumulation within the body. Also, Fluoride is known to have tremendous effects on bone cancer, joint problems, bone weakness, lower estrogen &amp; testosterone as well as Dental Fluorosis. Sodium Fluoride is the most toxic ionic molecule outside of potassium dichromate....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Toni</name>
        <uri>http://www.alfaomegaeditrice.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Environment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Fluoride" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Junk Science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Medicine Alternatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Toxic substances" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://info-wars.org">Infowars Ireland</a><br />
by ZyPhReX<br />
Dec 10, 2011</p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZvAAaAAHNvo" frameborder="0"></iframe><br />
It is now known – thanks to the meticulous research of Dr. Jennifer Luke from the University of Surrey in England – that the pineal gland is the primary target of fluoride accumulation within the body.<br />
Also, Fluoride is known to have tremendous effects on bone cancer, joint problems, bone weakness, lower estrogen &amp; testosterone as well as Dental Fluorosis. Sodium Fluoride is the most toxic ionic molecule outside of potassium dichromate.
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>All rat poison products have Sodium Fluoride. Many companies have begun fluoridating bottled water. Fluoride is also used in many prescription anti-depression drugs and that shows that it eliminates aggression and motivation in people. The Russians even did fluoride experimentations on their population. Not only that, but the main ingredient in Prozac is Fluoride.</p>
<p>Fluoride given to rats caused Bone Cancer and Liver Cancer as well. Fluoride is a neurotoxic agent that causes memory problems and IQ problems.</p>
<p>This sure as hell sounds like the wonder drug that would be used against the population if they wished to exercise control over it…</p>
<p>If you don’t know about fluoride, ask yourself, WHY WOULD THEY DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS? Is this even possible? Are all these lies? What’s of the matter? Do you think the Establishment and Government would care enough to fluoridate water for OUR benefit? Since WHEN does the Establishment care for the people?</p>
<p><b>Fluoride, Aspartame &amp; Agenda 21</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIrfIqNiFIQ&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIrfIqNiFIQ&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p><b>The Hard To Swallow Truth Documentary</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aTfyo0Xz_c" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aTfyo0Xz_c</a></p>
<p><b>Fluoride &amp; The Pineal Gland</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/pineal/index.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/pineal/index.aspx</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSZQ3ixu7a4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSZQ3ixu7a4</a></p>
<p><b>Mercury &amp; Fluoride — The Dumbing Down Of a Population</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3ARhMPVu-A" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3ARhMPVu-A</a></p>
<p><b>Fluoride Deception</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3y8uwtxrHo" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3y8uwtxrHo</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hW0_UMtsb4&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hW0_UMtsb4&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p><b>Hitler &amp; Fluoride</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dZPOJ4p1DM&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dZPOJ4p1DM&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p><b>The history of Fluoride</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUroSlMWTbY&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUroSlMWTbY&amp;feature=related</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dngers/health/bone/index.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dngers/health/bone/index.aspx</a></p>
<p><b>Fluoride and Bone Disease</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dngers/health/bone/index.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/brain/index.aspx</a></p>
<p><b>Fluoride &amp; the Brain</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/cancer/index.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/cancer/index.aspx</a></p>
<p><b>Fluoride and Cancer</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/gi/index.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/gi/index.aspx</a></p>
<p><b>Fluoride &amp; the Gastrointestinal Tract</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/infant/index.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-dangers/health/infant/index.aspx</a></p>
<p><b>Fluoride Warnings for Infants</b></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>DHA used in infant formula products comes from genetically modified algae</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2012/01/dha_used_in_infant_formula_products_comes_from_genetically_modified_algae.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2012:/eng//3.3588</id>

    <published>2012-01-04T09:23:15Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T14:46:11Z</updated>

    <summary>HFNN Dec 30, 2011 One of the most vulnerable segments of the population -- infants -- are being affected as chemical giant Martek Biosciences uses cronyism to have its patented GMO products classified as organic. The National Organic Program is trying to correct this, but in the meantime the &quot;organic&quot; infant formula or baby food parents feed their children could contain industrial Frankenfood. History of Irresponsibility The story of how this state of affairs came about reveals much on how politics and profit can undermine food safety. Here&apos;s a timeline on how the word &quot;organic&quot; is being undermined, creating a health threat for babies who are fed with formula. 2002:...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>sal</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="GMO" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Nutrition" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Toxic substances" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hfnn.ca">HFNN</a></p>
<p>Dec 30, 2011<br /></p>
<p><br />
<img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201201041017.jpg" width="425" height="282" alt="201201041017.jpg" style="float:left; padding-top:15px; padding-right:10px; padding-bottom:10px;" /></p>
<p>One of the most vulnerable segments of the population -- infants -- are being affected as chemical giant Martek Biosciences uses cronyism to have its patented GMO products classified as organic. The National Organic Program is trying to correct this, but in the meantime the "organic" infant formula or baby food parents feed their children could contain industrial Frankenfood.</p>
<p><b>History of Irresponsibility</b></p>
<p>The story of how this state of affairs came about reveals much on how politics and profit can undermine food safety. Here's a timeline on how the word "organic" is being undermined, creating a health threat for babies who are fed with formula.</p>
<p>2002: Food manufacturers begin supplementing infant formula and baby food with synthetic forms of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA). These polyunsaturated omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, naturally present in breast milk, are important components of the human brain and eyes. Although the form of DHA/ARA used in infant formulas is structurally incompatible with the form found in human milk, food manufacturers market their products with the claim that their formulas will make babies more intelligent.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>2006: In spite of the fact that its synthetic DHA/ARA is from laboratory-grown fermented algae and fungus through the use of hexane, a petroleum by-product and EPA-identified neurotoxin, Martek applies for organic status for its products. The USDA's National Organic Program (NOP) tells Martek its synthetic DHA and ARA does not quality as organic. Martek attorney J. Friedman ignores the decision of NOP staff and contacts NOP director Barbara Robinson to have the decision reversed.<br /></p>
<p>2009: A front page Washington Post article, "Integrity of Federal 'Organic' Label Questioned" uncovers the Martek story. The article quotes Martek's lawyer saying "I called Robinson up, I wrote an e-mail. It was a simple matter."</p>
<p>2002-2010: Parents and medical professionals observe reactions in babies fed with products containing Life's DHA, the product name Martek gives its patented GMO version of naturally occurring fatty acids. The range of infant health problems includes difficulties breathing and gastrointestinal disorders. When affected babies are no longer fed the formula, the ailments disappear. Although Freedom of Information Act requests reveal hundreds of FDA adverse event reports, the FDA is slow to react.</p>
<p>2011: FDA announces it will investigate claims that DHA/ARA infant formulas support brain and eye development. The National Organic Program is now trying to remedy its 2006 decision by asking Martek to formally ask permission of the NOP's National Organic Standards Board to use its DHA and AHA in organic products.</p>
<p><b>Products Containing this GMO</b></p>
<p>In the meantime, Life's DHA is being sold in many so-called organic brands which many consumers trust. Paying higher prices for products labeled as organic does not necessarily mean your family's food does not include this particular Frankenfood. From Martek's own website, here is a list of infant formulas containing their product which is both genetically modified and typically manufactured using a known toxin:</p>
<p>Earth's Best Organic Soy with DHA &amp; ARA (Hain Celestial Group)</p>
<p>Enfamil LIPIL (Mead Johnson Nutritionals)</p>
<p>Enfamil Next Step (Mead Johnson)</p>
<p>Isomil 2 Advance (Abbott Laboratories)</p>
<p>Nestle Good Start Supreme with DHA &amp; ARA (Nestle USA)</p>
<p>Parent's Choice Organic (Wal-Mart)</p>
<p>Similac Advance (Abbott Nutrition)</p>
<p>Ultra Bright Beginnings Lipids (PBM Products, LLC)</p>
<p>There is also a long list of pre-natal supplements as well as vitamins and dietary supplements for infants, children and adults containing this product. A surprisingly wide range of foods and beverages use this GMO substance including Apple Bran Muffins sold at Starbucks; Farm Pride Omega-3 Eggs; Horizon Organic Milk; Kroger Active Lifestyle Premium Light OJ Beverage; Minute Maid Enhanced Pomegranate Blueberry Juice; Pediasure Children's Beverage; Pompeian OlivExtra Plus and Silk Soymilk. The list of products containing this GMO is multinational, with products in many countries across the globe. If you want to check whether a supplement, food, or beverage you use contains Life's DHA, the full list is here: <a href="http://www.lifesdha.com/Products-Containing-lifesDHA-/tabid/682/Default.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.lifesdha.com/Products-Co...</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Gardasil boys come marching in – 4 new Gardasil deaths reported to VAERS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/12/gardasil_boys_come_marching_in_4_new_gardasil_deaths_reported_to_vaers.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2011:/eng//3.3586</id>

    <published>2011-12-21T14:55:59Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T17:43:15Z</updated>

    <summary>SaneVaxInc December 19, 2011 by Rosemary Mathis, Vice President of Victim Support, SANE VAX, INC. God grant me the serenity to realize that government health agencies are no longer going to protect my family’s health and wellbeing – the courage to stand up and say ‘no’ to forced vaccination and the wisdom to know the difference between coercion and compliance. Amen. - Serenity Prayer – Revised On December 16, 2011, Janny Stokvis, SANE Vax Inc. VAERS analyst reported four new HPV vaccine deaths (3 Gardasil and one unknown manufacturer) have been posted to VAERS. View the chart located at http://sanevax.org/november-14-2011… for reports up to November 14, which shows the increase...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>sal</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Cancer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Legislation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Medicine Alternatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Money" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Vaccines" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sanevax.org/" target="_blank">SaneVaxInc</a><br />
December 19, 2011<br />
by Rosemary Mathis, Vice President of Victim Support, SANE VAX, INC.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<div style="text-align: left;">
  <img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201112211535.jpg" width="240" height="200" alt="201112211535.jpg" style="padding-top:0px; padding-right:0px; padding-bottom:0px;" />
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><i>God grant me the serenity to realize that government health agencies are no longer going to protect my family’s health and wellbeing – the courage to stand up and say ‘no’ to forced vaccination and the wisdom to know the difference between coercion and compliance. Amen.</i> <i>- Serenity Prayer – Revised</i></p>
<p>On December 16, 2011, Janny Stokvis, SANE Vax Inc. VAERS analyst reported four new HPV vaccine deaths (3 Gardasil and one unknown manufacturer) have been posted to VAERS. View the chart located at <a href="http://sanevax.org/november-14-2011-vaer-reports-with-percentage-increase/" target="_blank">http://sanevax.org/november-14-2011</a>… for reports up to November 14, which shows the increase in reported deaths and injuries since August 2011.</p>
<p><b>Where is the Justice?</b></p>
<p><b>In the past three months almost 1,000 adverse reactions have been reported – and still only reflect 1 to 10% reporting<span style="font-weight: normal;">. According to Stokvis the four new VAERS death reports include: 437971 (<a href="http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=437971" target="_blank">http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/fi…</a> ) a hearsay foreign report of unknown age and gender; 437999 (<a href="http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=437999" target="_blank">http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/fi…</a>) a male age 18 from Ohio who committed suicide by hanging himself 5 days after his second shot; 441365 (<a href="http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=441365" target="_blank">http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/fi…</a> ) female age 14 – foreign report – with acute leukemia; and 442402 (<a href="http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=442402" target="_blank">http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/fi…</a> )male age 15 from Oregon.</span><br /></b></p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Yet the Merck vaccine machine continues to move forward bulldozing every obstacle in their way by changing laws, and paying off health agencies. Headlines in the Sydney Morning Herald on Friday – shouted – <i>Give boys cancer jab as well, say experts</i>, citing that ‘ALL teenage boys would be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted disease that causes some forms of cancer under an extension of a scheme now available to girls, the federal government’s expert panel, (the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee) has recommended. 1.<br /></p>
<p><b>Statewide Mandatory HPV Vaccination Bills Continue</b></p>
<p>FLORIDA: Headlines in The Florida Independent on December 7, state Florida GOP lawmaker’s bill would recommend HPV vaccine for young girls. “Senate Bill 1116 (<a href="http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_s1116__.DOCX&amp;DocumentType=Bill&amp;BillNumber=1116&amp;Session=2012" target="_blank">http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Secti…</a> ) would require the state’s health department to ‘adopt a rule adding the human papillomavirus to the list of communicable diseases for which immunizations are recommended.<br /></p>
<p>“Altman’s bill says:</p>
<p>Beginning with the 2012-2013 school year, each school shall provide the parent or guardian of a public school student entering grade 6 for whom the human papillomavirus vaccine is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration information, which the Department of Health shall prescribe, regarding the connection between the human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. The information must also notify the parent or guardian that a vaccine is available to help prevent human papillomavirus infection and that the vaccine is recommended to be given to females before they enter grade 8.” 2.</p>
<p><b>SOUTH CAROLINA:</b> <i>The Times and Democrat</i> posted a story on December 16, <i>Lawmakers want emails saved, girls vaccinated</i>. ‘State Rep. Bakari Sellers, D-Denmark, has sponsored a bill to offer parents of female seventh-graders the option of getting vaccinations to prevent cervical cancer. Implementation is contingent on the availability of state and federal funding.</p>
<p>‘Sellers said the health community has been supportive of the legislation.</p>
<p>“This is a good thing and it is already working in other, more conservative parts of the country like Virginia,” Sellers said. “We have many health issues in South Carolina and cervical cancer is a killer here. 3.</p>
<p><b>Where is the Sanity?</b></p>
<p>Apparently, not at the CDC. On December 16 an announcement was posted in <i>Morbidity and Mortality Weekly</i>, aptly titled <i>Public Health Prevention Service Accepting Applications for 2012 Class and Field Assignments</i>. Hello, is anybody home? ‘Health prevention’? But then again maybe the CDC has finally become aware they are preventing health and wellbeing through their associations with Big Pharma and the drugs being pushed on innocent medical consumers.</p>
<p>Through its 2-year field assignments, PHPS is available to support and supplement state or local health organizations in filling crucial program management needs…and health communication. 4.</p>
<p>Imagine CDC ‘professionals’ with master’s degrees implementing health prevention programs in your community. Bet these qualified ‘Health Preventionists’ will come armed with needles and serums. Hopefully their health communication skills are better than the parent agency.</p>
<p>Time Magazine’s Person of the Year Award goes to:</p>
<p>The Protestor!</p>
<p>Time Magazine has honored protestors abroad and in the U.S. for what has become ‘the greatest social-justice movement to emerge in the United States since the civil rights era.’</p>
<p>According to Time: ‘All over the world, the protesters of 2011 share a belief that their countries’ political systems and economies have grown dysfunctional and corrupt — sham democracies rigged to favor the rich and powerful and prevent significant change.’5.</p>
<p>Those of us protesting dangerous vaccines and vaccination practices are part of a larger global movement taking down the veil of hypocrisy and elitism meant to separate people from their governments. We are no longer the ‘anti-vaccine cultists’ – but part of the global mainstream demanding truth, transparency and justice.</p>
<p>God grant medical consumers the wisdom to know a health preventionist when they see one, and the courage to kick them off their property.</p>
<p><b>Source:</b></p>
<p>1. Sydney Morning Herald Give boys cancer jab as well, say experts</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/national/health/give-boys-cancer-jab-as-well-say-experts-20111216-1oyqn.html" target="_blank">http://www.smh.com.au/national/heal…</a></p>
<p>2. The Florida Independent Florida GOP lawmaker’s bill would recommend HPV vaccine for young girls <a href="http://floridaindependent.com/59794/thad-altman-hpv-vaccine" target="_blank">http://floridaindependent.com/59794…</a></p>
<p>3. The Times and Democrat, Lawmakers want emails saved, girls vaccinated <a href="http://thetandd.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_f3a3ff2e-27ad-11e1-abb9-001871e3ce6c.html" target="_blank">http://www.thetandd.com/news/local/…</a></p>
<p>4. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) December 16, 2011 / 60(49);1679; Announcements: Public Health Prevention Service Accepting Applications for 2012 Class and Field Assignments <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6049a2.htm?s_cid=mm6049a2_e" target="_blank">http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmw…</a></p>
<p>5. Time Magazine, The Protestor, <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2101745_2102132_2102373,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.time.com/time/specials/p…</a></p>
<p>By Leslie Carol Botha, Vice President of Public Relations at SaneVax Inc. (http://sanevax.org/).</p>
<p>About the author:</p>
<p>THE SANE VAX MISSION is to promote Safe, Affordable, Necessary &amp; Effective vaccines and vaccination practices through education and information. We believe in science-based medicine. Our primary goal is to provide the information necessary for you to make informed decisions regarding your health and well-being. We also provide referrals to helpful resources for those unfortunate enough to have experienced vaccine-related injuries.</p>
<p>Articles on this site are written by Norma Erickson, President and Leslie Carol Botha, women’s health educator, broadcast journalist and Vice-President Public Relations for SANE Vax, Inc. We also allow content from various contributing authors. Other members include Rosemary Mathis, mother of a Gardasil-injured daughter and Vice President Victim Support; Janny Stokvis, Vice-President Research, Freda Birrell, Secretary and HPV vaccine lobbyist United Kingdom /Scotland, and Linda Thompson, Treasurer.</p>
<p>We are demanding the HPV vaccines be taken off the market until an independent study on their safety and efficacy has been conducted. Until then, we are committing our efforts to an educational media campaign to alert the public about the dangers of the HPV vaccines.</p>
<p>SANE Vax, Inc. is involved in the ground-breaking production of the One More Girl Documentary which will premier in 2012. Please join our cause by contributing to this project by contacting Ryan Richardson, Producer at ryan@onemoregirlfilm.com.</p>
<p>For more information, please visit our site at <a href="http://sanevax.org/" target="_blank">http://sanevax.org</a>/.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New Study: Vaccinated Children Have 2 to 5 Times More Diseases and Disorders Than Unvaccinated Children</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/12/new_study_vaccinated_children_have_2_to_5_times_more_diseases_and_disorders_than_unvaccinated_children.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2011:/eng//3.3585</id>

    <published>2011-12-15T10:43:06Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T16:48:43Z</updated>

    <summary>health freedom alliance Submitted by Lois Rain on October 14, 2011 Preventable Vaccine-induced Diseases A German study released in September 2011 of about 8000 UNVACCINATED children, newborn to 19 years, show vaccinated children have at least 2 to 5 times more diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children. The results are presented in the bar chart below; the complete data and study results are here. The data is compared to the national German KIGGS health study of the children in the general population. Most of the respondents to the survey were from the U.S. (Click on the chart to see it better) The data was collected from parents with vaccine-free children...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>sal</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Medicine Alternatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Toxic substances" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Vaccines" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://healthfreedoms.org" target="_blank">health freedom alliance</a></p>
<p>Submitted by Lois Rain on October 14, 2011</p>
<p><img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201112151000.jpg" width="300" height="200" alt="201112151000.jpg" style="float:left; padding-top:10px; padding-right:10px; padding-bottom:0px;" /><br /></p>
<p><i><b>Preventable Vaccine-induced Diseases</b></i></p>
<p>A German study released in September 2011 of about 8000 UNVACCINATED children, newborn to 19 years, show vaccinated children have at least 2 to 5 times more diseases and disorders than unvaccinated children.</p>
<p>The results are presented in the bar chart below; <a href="http://www.vaccineinjury.info/vaccinations-in-general/health-unvaccinated-children/survey-results-illnesses.html" target="_blank">the complete data and study results are here</a>. The data is compared to the national German KIGGS health study of the children in the general population. Most of the respondents to the survey were from the U.S. (Click on the chart to see it better)<br /></p>
<p><br />
<a href="http://healthfreedoms.org/files/2011/10/vaxunvaxstudy.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201112151106.jpg" width="300" height="257" alt="201112151106.jpg" style="float:left; padding-top:20px; padding-right:7px; padding-bottom:10px;" /></a></p>
<p>The data was collected from parents with vaccine-free children via an internet questionnaire by vaccineinjury.info and Andreas Bachmair, a German classical homeopathic practitioner. The independent study is self-funded and is not sponsored by a large “credible” non-profit or government health organization with political and financial conflicts of interest; hence Bachmair relies on Google ads and donations for revenue. Each one of the 8000 cases are actual cases with medical documentation. Three other studies had similar results according to Bachmair and are reported below.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><i>No study</i> of health outcomes of vaccinated people versus unvaccinated has ever been conducted in the U.S. by CDC or any other agency in the 50 years or more of an accelerating schedule of vaccinations (now over 50 doses of 14 vaccines given before kindergarten, 26 doses in the first year). Most data collected by CDC is contained in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. The VAERS is generally thought to contain only 3 to 5 percent of reportable incidents. This is simply because only some immediate reactions are reported by doctors; but many are not admitted to be reactions to the vaccine. Most importantly, the VAERS numbers are only immediate reactions, which I would place with a few hours to a few weeks. Long-term vaccine-induced diseases and disorders are not recognized by parents or doctors when these conditions develop perhaps a few months to five years or more and would never be realized to come from multiple vaccinations. In other words, many children and adults have diseases and disorders that are vaccine induced and they never suspect they are from the vaccines, as this study indicates.<br /></p>
<p>The comparisons of the health of vaccine-free children with the health statistics of the general population are the same as comparing unvaccinated with vaccinated. This is simply because the general population of U.S. children are nearly 100 percent vaccinated.</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>Only four of the unvaccinated 8000 responded with severeautism (0.05%) and these were said to be high mercury cases. On the other hand, I had noticed the results show about a 1% rate for autism in the unvaccinated over 3 years old–about the same as vaccinated children. So I asked Bachmair why the data does not show significantly less. He told me he had invited many autism groups and internet autism lists to participate and thus skewed the results accordingly. If the true rate is 0.5%, I calculated that only 40 extra respondents (above the true average number) responded yes to autism, it would skew the results by a factor of 2. If the true rate is 0.25%, only 60 additional respondents (above the true average number) of the 8000 responded yes to autism, it would skew the results by a factor of 4. So it would not take many respondents from these lists to skew the results significantly.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The only other bias in this study may include the fact that parents of unvaccinated children are obviously concerned about the health risks of vaccines, and are more likely to make other healthier choices such as feeding their children a much better diet and using more natural remedies and using fewer pharmaceuticals.</p>
<p>Now <a href="http://journal.livingfood.us/2011/05/26/alarming-new-studies-50-of-u-s-children-have-chronic-illnesses-21-developmentally-disabled/" target="_blank">half the U.S. children suffer from chronic diseases and disorders and 21% are developmentally disabled</a>. Yet the public health system always uses the sacred mantra “vaccine-preventable diseases” when referring to their top public health achievement of mass vaccinations. I think we should be talking more in terms of preventable vaccine-induced diseases.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vaccineinjury.info/vaccinations-in-general/health-unvaccinated-children.html" target="_blank">The survey is still ongoing and you may take the survey here if you have unvaccinated children.</a></p>
<p>If you think this article and study is important, please use the Facebook button below and share it.–Augie</p>
<p>_________________</p>
<p><b>Other studies were cited by Andreas Bachmair</b></p>
<p><b>Salzburger Study</b></p>
<p>Results: of 1004 unvaccinated children, had</p>
<p><b>Asthma</b>, 0% (8-12% in the normal population)</p>
<p><b>A-topic dermatitis</b> 1.2% (10-20% in the normal population)</p>
<p><b>Allergies</b> 3% (25% in the normal population)</p>
<p><b>ADHD</b> 0.79% (5-10%) in children</p>
<p><b>Longterm Study in Guinea-Bissau</b> (1 Kristensen I, Aaby P, Jensen H.:“Routine vaccinations and child survival: follow up study in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa”, BMJ 2000; 321: 1435–41)</p>
<p>The children of 15,000 mothers were observed from 1990 to 1996 for 5 years.</p>
<p>Result: the death rate in vaccinated children against diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough is twice as high as the unvaccinated children (10.5% versus 4.7%).</p>
<p><b>New Zealand Survey (1992) (http://www.ias.org.nz)</b></p>
<p>The study involved 254 children. In which 133 children were vaccinated and 121 remained unvaccinated.</p>
<p>Result:</p>
<p>Symptom vaccinated unvaccinated</p>
<p>Asthma 20 (15%) 4 (3%)</p>
<p>Eczema or allergic rashes 43 (32%) 16 (13%)</p>
<p>Chronic otitis 26 (20%) 8 (7%)</p>
<p>Recurrent tonsillitis 11 (8%) 3 (2%)</p>
<p>Shortness of breath and sudden infant death syndrome 9 (7%) 2 (2%)</p>
<p>Hyperactivity 10 (8%) 1 (1%)</p>
<p>Download and read the <a href="http://www.vaccineinjury.info/images/stories/ias1992study.pdf" target="_blank">IAS1992study</a> now.</p>
<p>By Mr. Augie, Contributing Writer</p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a href="http://journal.livingfood.us/2011/10/09/new-study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases-and-disorders-than-unvaccinated-children/" target="_blank">http://journal.livingfood.us/2011/10/09/new-study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases-and-disorders-than-unvaccinated-children/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ALL the Vaccines Are Contaminated – Every Last One of Them</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/12/all_the_vaccines_are_contaminated_every_last_one_of_them.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2011:/eng//3.3584</id>

    <published>2011-12-12T09:00:14Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-03T16:08:09Z</updated>

    <summary>Infowars Ireland 10/12/2011 S. Edmonson for Salem-News.com Nov-29-2011 Experts say families need to take a critical look at vaccines. “The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination” – Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital (WASHINGTON, D.C.) – Have you been rushing out to get a yearly flu vaccine or diligently taking your children for the 40 or so mandated childhood vaccines? That’s really a shame because you have unwittingly been trading a run-of-the-mill flu or just the measles, for loading up your or your children’s bodies with cancer and other deadly viruses,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Toni</name>
        <uri>http://www.alfaomegaeditrice.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="AIDS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Money" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Toxic substances" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Vaccines" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://info-wars.org">Infowars Ireland</a><br />
10/12/2011<br />
S. Edmonson for <a href="http://www.salem-news.com">Salem-News.com</a><br />
Nov-29-2011</p>
<p><img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201112120950.jpg" width="300" height="385" alt="201112120950.jpg" /><br /></p>
<p><b>Experts say families need to take a critical look at vaccines.</b><br /></p>
<p>“The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination” – Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital</p>
<p>(WASHINGTON, D.C.) – Have you been rushing out to get a yearly flu vaccine or diligently taking your children for the 40 or so mandated childhood vaccines?</p>
<p>That’s really a shame because you have unwittingly been trading a run-of-the-mill flu or just the measles, for loading up your or your children’s bodies with cancer and other deadly viruses, a destructive bacteria, a chemical selected to damage fertility, and with synthetic DNA that threatens to damage your own DNA – the biologic code for your existence.</p>
<p>Who is saying the vaccines are contaminated?</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>None other than the (now deceased) head of vaccines at Merck, <b>Dr. Maurice Hillerman</b>, who <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvsXrVkjyz4">on camera</a> admitted that Merck’s Hepatitis B vaccines, contaminated with a virus, caused the AIDS epidemic in the US. He went on to say that all of Merck’s vaccines are contaminated with cancer and other viruses. (The US government has <a href="http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/us-concedes-hep-b-causes-lupus/" target="_blank">conceded the HEB B vaccine causes Lupus</a>. That vaccine is mandated for every infant in the US on the day of birth, and is associated with MS as well.)<br /></p>
<p>That vaccine is mandated for every infant in the US on the day of birth, and is associated with MS as well.)</p>
<p>For Jews who have almost religiously believed in medical authorities about vaccines and poo-pooed those worried about the safety of vaccines, they might want to notice that Hillerman was Jewish.</p>
<p>Or they might recognize that so is <b>Dr. Larry Palevsky</b>, <a href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/14/Expert-Pediatrician-Exposes-Vaccine-Myths.aspx" target="_blank">a board certified NY pediatrician</a>, who for ten years routinely gave vaccines to his patients until he noticed them losing eye contact and then began looking into the vaccines he had blindly trusted. He found that they are ALL contaminated with viruses that are so small they can never be removed. He no longer gives any vaccines. He now treats his young patients for autism and other neurologic injuries from vaccines.</p>
<p>Donald W. Scott, the editor of The Journal of Degenerative Diseases and the co-founder of the Common Cause Medical Research Foundation, links vaccines to AIDS (as did Hillerman) and to US bio-weapons research, and says they are contaminated with mycoplasma, a primitive bacteria that takes apart cell walls.</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.salem-news.com/articles/november292011/vaccines-contaminated-se.php" target="_blank">ALL the Vaccines Are Contaminated – Every Last One of Them</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>European Food Safety Authority reviews Aspartame, misses important details</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/12/european_food_safety_authority_reviews_aspartame_misses_important_details.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2011:/eng//3.3583</id>

    <published>2011-12-09T16:56:09Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-10T16:23:54Z</updated>

    <summary>The European Food Safety Authority, EFSA, has recently announced that they will again review the safety of aspartame, a controversial artificial sweetener that is a combination of two isolated amino acids and methanol. This new review comes after the agency whitewashed and glossed over the studies of the Italian Ramazzini Cancer research institute that had shown aspartame to be a carcinogen. Aspartame&apos;s approval by the US FDA in the 1980s, says Betty Martini of Mission Possible World Health International, was a political decision, taken over the objection of the FDA&apos;s own scientific panel. Studies used to obtain approval were sanitized, to hide damaging effects the sweetener had on laboratory animals...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Sepp</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Aspartame" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The European Food Safety Authority, EFSA, has recently announced that they will again review the safety of aspartame, a controversial artificial sweetener that is a combination of two isolated amino acids and methanol. This new review comes after the agency whitewashed and glossed over the studies of the Italian Ramazzini Cancer research institute that had <a href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2007/09/aspartame_cancer_risks_revisited_prenatal_exposure_may_be_greatest_concern.html" target="_blank">shown aspartame to be a carcinogen</a>.</p>

<p>Aspartame's approval by the US FDA in the 1980s, says Betty Martini of <a href="http://www.mpwhi.com/" target="_blank">Mission Possible World Health International</a>, was a political decision, taken over the objection of the FDA's own scientific panel. Studies used to obtain approval were sanitized, to hide damaging effects the sweetener had on laboratory animals and eventually, Donald Rumsfeld was brought in to push through the approval. </p>

<p>The European Food Safety Authority has recently published a number of studies that their new review will be based on, all "in the name of transparency". But they are missing all the good stuff, says Martini. </p>

<p>Here is what she has written to the European Parliament, which ordered the Food Safety Authority to do this new evaluation:</p>

<p><br />
<strong>REPORT TO PARLIAMENT:  EFSA CHEATS ABOUT ASPARTAME</strong></p>

<p>The European Food Safety Authority, EFSA, released industry studies they said were in the spirit of openness and transparency, but leaving out independent peer reviewed studies and aspartame's history of corruption.  It was anticipated.  Ajinomoto said they were confident aspartame would be found safe.  Are they working together?   See the in-depth report on studies EFSA released by Mark Gold of the Aspartame Toxicity Center:  </p>

<p> <a href="http://www.mpwhi.com/efsa_forgot_something_final.pdf" onclick="window.open('http://www.mpwhi.com/efsa_forgot_something_final.pdf','popup','width=612,height=792,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/efsa_forgot_something_final-tm.jpg" height="200" width="154" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Efsa Forgot Something Final" /></a> </p>

<p>Don't miss a word of it. This includes the history and statements from the Task Force on aspartame, which were so detrimental to G. D. Searle they sued to get them removed from the record. There are no secrets.  They went to every length to hide the fraud. The defense team hired the Justice Department prosecutors when the FDA called for Searle to be indicted for fraud.    With the constant stream of "independent" studies showing aspartame's deadly effects from heart attacks to cancer Parliament and EU said another review was needed.   Of particular interest is a Danish study on 60,000 women showing aspartame can jump preterm birth rates 78%.  Parliament has every reason to be concerned.  The FDA admitted aspartame causes birth defects, and then sealed the records.  We recovered and restored them to the Bressler Report.  Pediatric professor of genetics, Dr. Louis Elsas, testified before Congress his concerns, yet the bill to put a moratorium on aspartame and have NIH do independent studies on the problems being seen in the population like effect to the fetus, drug interaction  and behavioral problems in children, etc, never got out of committee. </p>

<p> Now Parliament wants a warning for pregnant women and industry says no warning is needed.  They know a warning of birth defects means aspartame is no additive.  It's an addictive, excitoneurotoxic, carcinogenic and genetically engineered drug and adjuvant that damages the mitochondria or powerhouse of the cell and interacts with drugs and vaccines.  The methanol is classified as a narcotic and causes chronic methanol poisoning.  This affects the dopamine system of the brain and causes addiction.     It was obvious what was going to happen ...  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>- - - </p>

<p>Dr. Herman Koeter, former EFSA head released his statement that they were pressured by industry to hijack science, stating in particular the Ramazzini studies which showed aspartame is a multipotential carcinogen.  FDA toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, testified before Congress aspartame violates the Delaney Amendment because of the cancer shown in original studies, admitting that based on this no allowable daily intake could be set.  EFSA's conflict of interests has recently been exposed as well. </p>

<p> <a href="http://www.mpwhi.com/efsa_ans_panel.pdf" onclick="window.open('http://www.mpwhi.com/efsa_ans_panel.pdf','popup','width=596,height=842,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/efsa_ans_panel-tm.jpg" height="200" width="141" border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" alt="Efsa Ans Panel" /></a></p>

<p>It was anticipated that EFSA would show their loyalty to industry again, and omit the facts and independent studies.  We knew we had to advise Parliament what was going on in advance.  On our web site, <a href="http://www.mpwhi.com/main.htm" target="_blank">www.mpwhi.com</a> you will see a button for "peer reviewed research" at the top of the page.  The banners on the first page present  the congressional records, the UPI investigation exposing the corruption, the FDA Board of Inquiry report revoking aspartame's petition for approval, Dr. John Olney's 49 page report to the BOI explaining it will cause birth defects and the "Complete Bressler Report" with the teratology studies returned that had been hidden for over 30 years admitting birth defects.  The "Report for Schools" contains the evidence needed to show aspartame is a teratogen causing birth defects and mental retardation.  On the top buttons find FDA's report of 92 symptoms from seizures to blindness, on their stationery.  "Aspartame News" goes back for years and even has the damning CDC investigation, which was sent to EFSA but not posted.</p>

<p>EFSA showing only the industry side of the picture is fraudulent since they deliberately conceal its toxicity.    With the whole picture in front of them they chose to support industry.  EFSA asked for all records in PDF form and not only were these resent by Lane Shore, Mission Possible Chicago, but he did in-depth research and sent them more damning records.</p>

<p>James Turner, renowned DC Consumer Attorney, Naders Raider and author of The Chemical Feast, joined with neuroscientist John Olney, M.D. in 1974 and fought to prevent FDA approval of aspartame.  Dr. Olney did studies on aspartic acid, which comprises 40% of the aspartame molecule, finding it caused lesions in the brains of mice.  His report to the FDA Public Board of Inquiry predicted that aspartame would produce serious problems, including birth defects, damaging the brains of babies and children, a serious subtle side effect that no one has seriously looked for.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.wnho.net/dr_olney1.doc" target="_blank">http://www.wnho.net/dr_olney1.doc</a></p>

<p>On reviewing the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA) publishing of original studies submitted by the manufacturer to get aspartame approval, Turner said:    <blockquote><em>"If this is what EFSA calls openness and transparency it fails the laugh test. It is the false history we hear from the manufacturers of aspartame over and over again. These studies were so corrupt the FDA attempted to have the company, G. D. Searle, indicted for fraud.  The Department of Justice assigned two attorneys, Sam Skinner and William Conlon, to prosecute Searle, whose offences were so blatant as to be indefensible. Searle's defense attorneys, Sidley & Austin, killed the government's action by hiring the prosecutors, the statute of limitations expired, and the case forever died.  Years later Skinner publicly apologized for his actions in the aspartame case, when he faced U.S. Senate confirmation for a cabinet post.</p>

<p>"Where in EFSA's openness and transparency strategy is the FDA special task force report condemning Searle's studies as a violation of law? Where is the FDA internal report on cancer-causing byproducts created by aspartame consumption? Where is the FDA letter seeking a grand jury investigation of Searle studies, including aspartame studies on monkeys, which had grand mal seizures after consuming aspartame? Where is the Public Board of Inquiry ruling banning the sale of aspartame because of the aspartame animal studies in which statistically significant numbers of animals got cancer? This report was subsequently overturned by a new FDA Commissioner who had to leave FDA because of conflicts of interest.  Where is the scientific analysis of the Commissioners ruling that is filled with scientific misstatements, non-sequiturs and false science used to overrule the Public Board of Inquiry?  How is it possible for any decision maker to rely on a report that leaves out most of the story? It is not possible.  Decision makers relying on EFSA should demand it supply them the totality of the aspartame record, not only the carefully selected, flawed and ultimately false reports from aspartames manufacturers.</p>

<p>"In 1970, three years before Searle petitioned FDA for aspartame approval, Dr. Olney was so concerned about aspartame safety that he asked Searle to join him in doing studies in his laboratory where he could show them what aspartame was doing to animal brains.  The brain damage was shown and Olney felt there would be no approval, but G. D. Searle did not submit the results to the FDA when it sought approval of aspartame.  Where are the studies Searle did showing lesions in the brains of aspartame consuming mice and then withheld? The marketing of aspartame is not because it has been scientifically approved as safe, but through political manipulation and dishonesty.</p>

<p>Donald Rumsfeld was hired as Searle's CEO in 1977, and asked to meet with me. We met and I suggested that we create a team of researchers that could answer the troubling aspartame questions one way or another. After six months of dithering, Searle decided against trying to address the dangers of aspartame scientifically. The FDA appointed a Public Board of Inquiry, which held hearings and issued its report in October of 1980. In November of 1980, Reagan won the election for U.S. President and Rumsfeld turned up on President Reagan's transition team.  He "called in his markers," words now famous for how aspartame was approved.</p>

<p>The new President, who owed Rumsfeld favors, wrote an executive order that made the FDA Commissioner powerless to sign into law the decision of the FDA Public Board of Inquiry to revoke the petition for approval.  Then Reagan appointed Arthur Hull Hayes, a physician who worked at the Pentagon while Rumsfeld was Defense Secretary under President Ford, as the new FDA Commissioner. Hayes appointed a task force to review the PBOI ruling. The committee scientists found that the Board position on the cancer causing potential of aspartame was supported by the science and advised Hayes to approve the findings of the Board. Instead Hayes overruled the Board. Where in the EFSA openness and transparency position are the reports of the FDA scientists who reviewed and approved the PBOI findings of the dangers reported in the Searle animal cancer studies?</p>

<p>Hayes ruling allowed a potentially deadly excitoneurotoxic drug to be marketed for human consumption. The EFSA finding, which hides from decision makers very important facts they need to know to make sound decisions, if adopted would allow aspartame to spread its harm throughout the world. (The decision is not only whether to permit the sale of aspartame but also how it should be labeled if it is sold.)  The Guardian reported that aspartame was effectively approved in England thru a business deal with Dr. Paul Turner, chair of the government committee charged with reviewing aspartame safety, who at the time he served on the committee was also a consultant to the aspartame manufacturer. He did this without the public knowing. Where are Dr. Turner's recommendations and the facts surrounding it in EFSA's open and transparent posting? These are facts that decision makers and the interested people, including vulnerable consumers, of the world should be told by EFSA.</p>

<p>"Continually from 1970, independent study after independent study has failed to show that aspartame is safe, while thousands of consumers have reported heart attacks, cancer, birth defects, obesity, strokes, and other harm occurring after they consumed aspartame.  Where in the EFSA posting are the thousands of aspartame consumer adverse reaction reports received by regulatory agencies around the world? Studies suggest DNA damage, increased cancer incidence and cell damage from formaldehyde, an aspartame by-product, all in connection with aspartame consumption. Where are these studies in the EFSA posting? For the 4 decades I've worked to publicize including thorough food labels the dangers of aspartame (with some success, since it never reached its goal of substantially replacing sugar), the studies showing its lack of safety have piled up. EFSA has purported to present, with self-proclaimed openness and transparency, the entire scientific story regarding aspartame. In fact, it has only presented that portion of the story that advances the interest of aspartames manufacturer. It has ignored the rest of the story, which shows the aspartame risks consumers face.</p>

<p>Why has EFSA ignored almost every study showing risk? By some estimates, virtually all-independent studies done on aspartame contain critical information about harm?  EFSA should not be permitted to get away with presenting as if uncontroverted data that FDA officials, scientists and lawyers repudiated and that one FDA Commissioner called reprehensible, actually favor aspartame. Allowing EFSA's posting to go officially unchallenged could result in Codex using it to validate marketing it in countries where it is now not approved, creating the likelihood that vast numbers of new consumers will be harmed. Parliament and Europe must have the truth aspartame has not been shown to be safe and study after study says it is spreading harm."</em></blockquote>   Jim Turner can be seen in the movie, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World: <a href="http://www.documentarywire.com/sweet-misery-a-poisoned-world" target="_blank">http://www.documentarywire.com/sweet-misery-a-poisoned-world</a> .  Here is his clip: <a href="http://www.soundandfury.tv/pages/rumsfeld.html" target="_blank">http://www.soundandfury.tv/pages/rumsfeld.html</a></p>

<p><br />
Dr. Ralph Walton, psychiatrist, did a study on aspartame.  Monsanto refused to sell him the aspartame. They were not funding or controlling it, and knew the findings would be made public.  The administrator of the hospital who took part in the study had a retinal detachment and lost his vision in one eye.  Another subject had conjunctival bleeding.  Some said they were being poisoned.  The institution had to stop the study.  Any honest study on aspartame will show detrimental results.  </p>

<p> Dr. Walton did research for 60 Minutes when they did an expose on aspartame after Dr. John Olney made world news on aspartame and the brain tumor connection.  The aspartame molecule breaks down to <em>diketopiperazine,</em> a brain tumor agent.    Dr. Walton's research showed only industry funded and controlled studies ever said aspartame was safe, but that 92% of independent and unbiased peer reviewed research showed the problems.  He also said if you removed 6 studies the FDA had something to do with (because of their controversy after approval) and one pro-industry summary 100% of independent studies show aspartame harm.  This was sent to EFSA and is on our web site.  Dr. Walton is a psychiatrist in practice in Mayville, New York.  Today he said:   <blockquote><em>"I have had a busy psychiatric practice for over 40 years, and for the past 25 years have dealt with the many problems which the artificial sweetener aspartame has caused my patients.  It can lower the seizure threshold, leading some patients to have grand mal seizures.  For patients with underlying mood and anxiety disorders it can significantly accentuate symptoms. As an excitotoxin I believe that it is a factor in multiple neurologic disorders, including MS and autism.  The marked increase in prevalence of these disorders coincides with the introduction of aspartame into our food supply.  The failure of the FDA and EFSA to remove this toxin is particularly tragic.  Unfortunately these regulatory bodies are apparently responding to tainted industry sponsored research and ignoring the growing number of independent studies identifying multiple problems."</em></blockquote>  Everything Dr. John Olney  warned of  four decades ago have come to pass from birth defects to brain tumors.  Attorney Ed Johnson of San Antonio, Texas who is in the movie Sweet Misery wrote yesterday:   <blockquote><em>"I have been a licensed Texas Attorney since 1971, and served as Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Texas, U.S. Department of Justice, from 1972 - 1976. In December of 1996, while at the peak of my legal career as the Chairman and CEO of the 18th largest law firm in San Antonio, Texas, I was diagnosed with the first of two brain tumors and had surgery in 1996, 62 days of daily radiation in 1997, and a second surgery in 1998 (in which my pituitary gland was removed). I was on medical disability for 4 years because of the side affects of the radiation. In July 2000, I wrote a research report which documents the causal connection between aspartame and brain tumors entitled: "Aspartame Causes Brain Tumors ... Beyond A Shadow Of A Doubt," which is published at <a href="http://www.dorway.com/lawyer1.html" target="_blank">www.dorway.com/lawyer1.html</a>    You can contact me at edjohnson@stic.net or 210 877-0855. " </em></blockquote> </p>

<p>In original studies aspartame caused several types of brain tumors including pituitary and astrocytomas.    About birth defects, Dr. Bill Deagle said: <blockquote><em>"The European Environmental Association has projected that with the rise of autism caused by toxic foods like Aspartame, MSG, Fluoride, and environmental degradation, by 2013 no one will be born in the Western World that does not to some degree have autism. My board of AAEM, American Academy of Environmental Medicine and Dr. William Rae, director of the Dallas Environmental Clinic agreed in open discussion at the October 2010 annual meeting."</em></blockquote>  <br />
 I spoke with Dr. James Bowen today about the original studies and EFSA's cover-up.   He said: <blockquote><em>"The US government first licensed aspartame as a chemical warfare weapon, a brain washing agent.  When I started using it I was so brainwashed by it, and addicted when people told me it was killing me I couldn't believe them.  When I finally developed what looked like an ALS from it I went to a shrink because I was so depressed I wanted to kill myself, and he told me some chemical agent was doing this to me.  So I got off of it and every study that I discovered on it showed it to be a horribly toxic poison and a potent abortifacient.  It destroys human sexuality and fertility.  After I got off of it, it took me two months to achieve apparent normalcy.  I had no idea what big political foes I was stepping on until I was approached by an FDA Investigator who told me to stop immediately exposing aspartame and that I was endangering my career in life.  I lost my home and my career and was left chemically hypersensitive, which leaves me chemically damaged whenever I'm exposed to chemical influences. </p>

<p>" I am presently partially paralyzed again and I've totally lost balance and stagger and fall at times.  My bladder empties itself automatically without warning.   Both in my own practice and personal contacts I see aspartame victims and they have no idea until I warn them.   They are always very grateful to be alerted to what has caused their problem.  Everyone involved with approval should be criminally prosecuted.  EFSA should get its act together and release the truth not industry propaganda. Their concern should be with food safety, not loyalty to the manufacturer."</em></blockquote>  Think about pharmacists who know and understand how this deadly drug interacts with other drugs.  They feel their hands are tied.  Paul Scavone wrote:  <blockquote><em>"Over the past 51 years, I have practiced both as a pharmacologist and a retail pharmacist. In this capacity I became aware of the deleterious health effects of aspartame. For the last 16 years, I have lectured internationally, sharing and consulting with literally thousands whose health has been detrimentally affected by the use of products containing aspartame.  "Research tells us that aspartame releases free methanol or methyl alcohol (wood alcohol) in any liquid. Methanol has a high toxicity in humans. Typically the toxic effects occur over time. Methanol can be fatal due to its CNS depressants properties or in a process of toxication, it is metabolized to formic acid leading to symptoms of hypoxia at the cellular level and also causing metabolic acidosis among a variety of other metabolic disturbances.  "Additionally methanol poisoning can cause testosterone suppress which reduces sexual interest, pleasure and capacity. Aspartame damages the hypothalamus which also suppresses the formation of testosterone."</p>

<p>"It would be appropriate to hypothesize that aspartame consumption has played a major role in the proliferation of erectile dysfunction. Is it any wonder that we now see 30 and 40 year old men requiring drug intervention to combat erectile dysfunction. The pharmaceutical manufacturers of Viagra. and Cialis have a love affair with Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi.</p>

<p>"Consider the nightmare of drug interactions and deaths.  These are discussed in Dr. H. J. Roberts medical text, "Aspartame Disease:  An Ignored Epidemic" in great detail.  These can also be found in Dr. Russell Blaylock's book, "Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills".  After decades of independent studies and public record after record no one has had the ability to get this deadly chemical off the market to the detriment of the public at large."</em></blockquote>  Paul Scavone, Dr. of Pharmacy, Cedarstone Ledge, Clarence, NY 14031-1431  716-631-3344 </p>

<p>Arthur Evangelista, PhD, former FDA Investigator, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, says:  <blockquote><em>"While working with the FDA, I regularly have seen the political influences of Pharmaceutical corporations as exemplified in the workings of the Food & Drug Administration.   "After intensively studying the effects and processes of Aspartame, I realized this product exemplified political subversion of public health for profit. I also noted through review of this data, that a multitude of Food & Drug employees recommended further safety studies before this product (toxin) was approved.   "It became apparent that the Food & Drug political appointees (managers) were consistently and continuously at odds with their own scientists. This was due to the FDA manager's fraudulent manipulation of data, and the suppression and concealment of the objective results, in order to subvert the approval process.    "This fraud was perpetrated to provide positive outcomes to G.D. Searle (and Monsanto), and also with those Chemical-Pharmaceutical firms seeking approval, often with deadly consequences. This also occurred with medical devices and in other  areas of FDA's laboratory and scientific investigations, rendering many of the FDA reviews, tainted and fraudulent.   "Thus, the order of political procedure was to ignore G.D. Searle's own scientific studies (showing patho-physiological effects),  and, subsequently, ignoring (other) later credible independent studies on the toxicity of Aspartame. This included the restriction of historical information regarding the three components of this product. Here, we see the political nature of Mr. Donald Rumsfeld, et al, appropriating influences to undermine or conceal many of the studies showing toxic side results.   "Examples of Phenylalanine's toxicity were well studied during the mid-1930s, which has long known to disrupt brain-chemistry function. The same applies to Aspartic acid (isolates) for its neural, excitation effect.  Methanol is a known carcinogen, especially when used in this particular chemical compound, which is out-of-nature and isolated."   Today Dr. Evangelista is Dir. Of Operations and Research, Public Health, Medical Fraud, Investigations. </p>

<p>Another important issue EFSA must address is the methanol issue.  Because this is free methanol, not bound to pectin or accompanied by ethanol (classic antidote for methanol toxicity) like in fruit and vegetables it converts to formaldehyde.  The Trocho Study in Barcelona by Dr. Maria Alemany showed the formaldehyde embalms living tissue and damages DNA.  No wonder aspartame causes so much cancer.  The aspartame's manufacturer tried to assassinate Dr. Alemany's character.  When I visited Dr. Alemany in Barcelona he told me, "Aspartame will murder 200 million people."</em></blockquote></p>

<p><br />
 Jim McDonald of the UK Aspartame Awareness Campaign says in the US the methanol is 44 times too high and 35 times to high in the UK.  The severe problem of metabolism of methanol in humans was not taken into account when aspartame was approved.  This is backed up by publicly available data on Methanol in the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) and then some very simple arithmetic. </p>

<p>While FDA toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, admitted in Congress that aspartame violated the Delaney Amendment which forbids putting anything in food you know will cause cancer, he also said the FDA should not have been able to set an allowable daily intake for this reason.  Now consider in order to calculate the ADI for a product intended for the food chain, a No Observable Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) must be found in laboratory animals.  The amount of product which produces "No Adverse Effect Level" is divided by a safety factor of 100 to give the ADI.  For aspartame in the UK, 2 studies where rats were fed aspartame, resulted in an NOAEL of 4000mg/kg, divided by 100 gives an ADI of 40mg/kg.    This ADI takes no account of the toxicity of methanol - NOTE: the lethal dose of methanol in humans is 343mg/kg.   </p>

<p>Mr. McDonald says if an adult ingested the methanol in the NOAEL of aspartame it would probably kill him.  A NOAEL of aspartame in rats is NOT a NOAEL of methanol in humans.  This issue cannot go unanswered.  </p>

<p>There have now been three Ramazzini Studies showing aspartame is a multipotential carcinogen and causes everything from leukemia and lymphoma to cancer of the liver and lungs.  EFSA has tried to rebut them because as Dr. Koeter confessed they were pressured by industry.  Aspartame caused cancer in original studies and it should be no surprise it causes cancer in independent studies. <br />
 <br />
When the first Ramazzini Study was released after being peer reviewed by 7 world experts Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., author of "Excitotoxins:  The Taste That Kills"  said  <blockquote><em>"The study released in the European Journal of oncology by Morando Soffritti and co-workers should terrify mothers and all those consuming aspartame sweetened products. This was a carefully done study, which clearly demonstrated a statistically significant increase in several types of lymphomas and leukemia's in rats. Both of these malignancies have increased significantly in this country since the widespread use of aspartame. </p>

<p>"This study confirmed the previous study by Dr. Trocho and co-workers, which also found the formaldehyde breakdown product of aspartame to be damaging to cellular DNA and that this damage was accumulative. The type of damage was a duplicate of that associated with cancers. Along with this most recent study, this means that drinking a single diet cola sweetened with aspartame every day could increase one's risk of developing a lymphoma or leukemia. </p>

<p>"They also found an increased incidence of malignant brain tumors, even though it was not statistically significant. This does not mean there is no association to brain tumors, since only the animals exposed to aspartame developed the tumors. With children and pregnant women drinking the largest amount of diet colas, this puts their children at the greatest risk of developing one of these horrible diseases. Their study found that even low doses of aspartame could cause these malignancies; yet, the higher the dose, the more cancers that were seen. </p>

<p>"Since aspartame can increase obesity and may even cause the metabolic syndrome that affects 48 million Americans, there is no reason to ever consume this product. At the least it should be immediately banned from all schools."</em></blockquote></p>

<p><br />
EFSA received many of Dr. Blaylock's reports which are not on web in their spirit of "openness".<br />
  <br />
World expert on aspartame H. J. Roberts, M.D.  today wrote on "Aspartame Disease:  It's Origin and Evolution".  He said: <blockquote><em>"As a consultant internist and endocrinologist in the early 1980's, I encountered an increasing number of patients with problems and complications that had baffled the physicians.  Careful observation revealed that many could be specifically attributed to the use of products containing the chemical sweetener aspartame by weight-conscious persons.  This association was reinforced by the alleviation of symptoms after withdrawal of such products, and their prompt recurrence following re-challenge - despite intense corporate, bureaucratic and "peer-reviewed" denials. </p>

<p>"This issue assumed enormous public health importance as aspartame products were being consumed by over half the population.  Its manifestations included major neuropsychiatric afflictions ("refractory" headaches; seizures; confusion; dizziness; depression), the aggravation of diabetes mellitus, visual changes, paradoxic obesity, addiction, joint pains and hyperthyroidism...leading to extensive "negative" diagnostic studies and potentially hazardous interventions. </p>

<p>"These observations were documented in scientific articles initially based on 100 patients and then 551 patients and subsequent books - including "Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic" presenting data involving 1200 cases.  They emphasized high-risk groups that should specifically avoid aspartame products.  The independent confirmation of my observations by professionals has been gratifying.  Another important aspect of these studies was insight into the nature of many disorders, including Alzheimer's disease."</em></blockquote></p>

<p>Dr. Roberts in his many books on aspartame has exposed the original studies and the shenanigans pulled to market a chemical poison for human consumption.  Consider the failure to challenge the manufacturer's contract with Universities Associated for Research and Education in Pathology (UAREP).  This private group was engaged to determine the factual accuracy of prior aspartame studies - but with one stipulation that UAREP "shall not express an opinion" regarding either the design or safety significance of these studies, nor make recommendations about the safety of aspartame for human use.  How outrageous can you get?  G. D. Searle actually "swore them to silence"!  They paid for this silence $500,000!! </p>

<p>Richard A. Merrill was the FDA's Chief Counsel who requested a grand jury investigate the manufacturer for its alleged "concealing material facts and making false statements in reports of  animal studies conducted to establish the safety of aspartame. </p>

<p>He prophetically projected: <em>"The FDA must receive the truth, not psychological warfare.  To emphasize the importance of safety data on aspartame, we note that if ultimately approved for marketing, this sweetening agent can reasonably be expected to be part of the daily diet of every American." </em> </p>

<p>Through the political chicanery of Don Rumsfeld aspartame is now marketed throughout the world causing disability and death.  Government agencies supposedly there to protect the people like EFSA have given their loyalty instead to the aspartame manufacturers.  It's in your hands now, Parliament. Aspartame was never proven safe.</p>

<p>Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum<br />
Mission Possible Intl<br />
9270 River Club Parkway<br />
Duluth, Georgia 30097<br />
770 242-2599<br />
www.mpwhi.com, www.dorway.com, www.wnho.net<br />
Aspartame Toxicity Center, www.holisticmed.com/aspartame <br />
Bettym19@mindspring.com  </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Retroviral Talk: Is HIV Just in Lesions? </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/12/retroviral_talk_is_hiv_just_in_lesions_.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2011:/eng//3.3582</id>

    <published>2011-12-01T14:37:22Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-01T14:44:24Z</updated>

    <summary> International Aids Day Special - Listening to medical propaganda, one would think a retrovirus is a very bad thing - something to be killed immediately wherever it is found. But nothing could be further from the truth. Just like cholesterol has been condemned as &quot;bad&quot; and this lie has given rise to a billion-dollar industry of useless and even damaging cholesterol lowering (statin) drugs, so have retrovira been condemned, giving rise to a billion-dollar industry of Aids research and pharmaceutical intervention, to cocktails of &quot;anti-retroviral&quot; drugs they tell us are a must for anyone reacting to that very unspecific test that shows up stressed proteins associated with HIV. The...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Sepp</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="AIDS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
International Aids Day Special - Listening to medical propaganda, one would think a retrovirus is a very bad thing - something to be killed immediately wherever it is found. But nothing could be further from the truth. </p>

<p>Just like cholesterol has been condemned as "bad" and this lie has given rise to a billion-dollar industry of useless and even damaging cholesterol lowering (statin) drugs, so have retrovira been condemned, giving rise to a billion-dollar industry of Aids research and pharmaceutical intervention, to cocktails of "anti-retroviral" drugs they tell us are a must for anyone reacting to that very unspecific test that shows up stressed proteins associated with HIV. The retrovirus being targeted, HIV, incidentally has never been shown to do anything that could be construed as destroying the human immune system. As a matter of fact, it seems to be a necessary component of healing wounds and lesions, as Cal Crilly has discovered.</p>

<p>Cal is one of the few people who are able and willing to look at these details. His latest brainchild is a question: <strong>"Is HIV to be found just in lesions?" </strong> </p>

<p>Good reading!</p>

<p><br />
<em>I've been looking at this subject for nearly 14 years now, I guess I stumbled in on a mess.</p>

<p>I often say if you analyse gibberish you may be talking gibberish so anything I write you can decide.</p>

<p>The main thing to know is that everything written about HIV in the last 26 years by the mainstream is complete rubbish and utterly dangerous and if you don't question it you'll miss out on seeing the panic as people realise it's gibberish.</p>

<p>I've talked to many friends who got tagged by the HIV test and the incredible mess the medical profession put them through.</p>

<p>Some did not survive and this is entirely due to medical incompetence.</p>

<p>But this incompetence goes to the very top and they are the ones who need to step out of the way and admit they stuffed up.</p>

<p>For as long as the HIV debacle goes on as is no one in the medical profession can hold their head up high.</p>

<p>Unless they were one of the few that spoke out.</p>

<p><img alt="Cal_Stock-market-crash.jpg" src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/img/Cal_Stock-market-crash.jpg" width="400" height="400" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></p>

<p>These were my conclusions after a year or two of looking into the heart disease aspect of HIV 'infection'.</p>

<p>We are overall looking at heart disease, leukemia and cancers and the immune failure seen with AIDS is a result of medical incompetence, adding in drug users simply doesn't count.</p>

<p>They all end up with liver damage and immune failure anyway.</em><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>- - - </p>

<p><font size="4px" face="verdana"><strong>Is HIV just in lesions?</strong></font></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/02/aids_cd4_t-cell_test_is_a_measure_of_fat.html" target="_blank">HIV and CD4 T-cells</a> both <a href="http://www.voanews.com/english/news/health/-Scientists-Disarm-AIDS-Virus-Attack-on-Immune-System-130313993.html" target="_blank">need fat to exist</a>.</p>

<p><a href="http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=102188960.html" target="_blank">HIV emerges</a> from <a href="http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/full/74/21/10256" target="_blank">activated HLA-DR cells</a> when wounds or <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1541465/pdf/clinexpimmunol00094-0090.pdf" target="_blank">arterial lesions</a> need fixing.</p>

<p>Once a lesion is finished repairing HIV will leave the scene.</p>

<p>This because it's the binding RNA for caveolin.</p>

<p>So HIV binds caveolin to cell walls.</p>

<p>Well that's what I think...and that's what it looks like...</p>

<p>Caveolin is a lipid raft involved in cell movement, signalling and of course smooth muscle cell movement in lesions.</p>

<p>We have a lot of fat in our bodies, things like caveolin help it hold together.</p>

<p>And it looks like HIV is needed for that process.</p>

<p>The immune system also relies on these fat or lipid rafts to send signals.</p>

<p>Once HIV has bonded to caveolin to make the lipid raft stick to cells then the HIV has done its job and will not be easy to detect in blood samples in healthy people without lesions.</p>

<p>This is why caveolin is a HIV inhibitor.</p>

<p>Once HIV sticks to caveolin it's done its job.</p>

<p>Muscle and wound repair needs both fat as Cholesterol and Selenium along with Vitamin C and Lysine.</p>

<p>Anyone with low fat has low CD4 T-cells as CD4 T-cells respond to cholesterol but also anyone with low fat and lesions will not be able to repair wounds and HIV will remain loose until there is enough fat to make a <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14987385" target="_blank">lipid raft for the HIV</a> to bind to a cell wall.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nature.com/nrc/journal/v3/n8/abs/nrc1146.html" target="_blank">All cancers</a> and <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9878546" target="_blank">leukemia</a> have activated <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12499388" target="_blank">HLA-DR and lipid raft movement</a> and caveolin... these diseases are largely caused by <a href="http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141021?journalCode=immunol" target="_blank">structural collapse</a> of our collagen and <a href="http://jcs.biologists.org/content/114/6/1169" target="_blank">cytoskeleton</a>.</p>

<p>HIV is also likely to be <a href="http://www.retrovirology.com/content/8/1/15" target="_blank">a vital part of lipid raft scaffolding</a>.</p>

<p>This is why Antiretroviral drugs dissolve and wreck fat and leave fat cells blobbing all over the place.</p>

<p>The loose fat raises T-cells counts but because the antiretrovirals stop HIV from doing it's job the lesions remain in AIDS patients and they die.</p>

<p>HIV is also just one of the retroviruses in our bodies.</p>

<p>Our genome has 8% retrovirus.</p>

<p>No one knows what AIDS drugs do to all of our retroviral functions because the entire medical profession is bent on destroying them even if they kill the patient.</p>

<p><em>"Caveolin-1 is a scaffolding protein that organizes and concentrates specific ligands within the caveolae membranes. We identified a conserved caveolin-1 binding motif in the HIV-1 transmembrane envelope glycoprotein gp41 and designed several synthetic peptides, referred to as CBD1, corresponding to the consensus caveolin-1 binding domain in gp41."</em><br />
 <br />
"Interestingly, gp41 exists as a stable complex with caveolin-1 in HIV-infected cells."</p>

<p>The caveolin-1 binding domain of HIV-1 glycoprotein gp41 is an efficient B cell epitope vaccine candidate against virus infection.</p>

<p>"Interestingly, gp41 exists as a stable complex with caveolin-1 in HIV-infected cells."</strong></p>

<p>Why didn't anyone ask why it's a stable complex?</p>

<p>Caveolin once bound to HIV then stops HIV jumping around looking for caveolin to bind to.</p>

<p><em>"Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) is a major protein constituent of caveolae, a type of plasma membrane raft. We observed that coexpression of human Cav-1 with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) blocked virion production from cells that are ordinarily highly permissive. Further investigation showed that this effect is specific, occurs at low ratios of Cav-1 to HIV-1 DNA, depends on expression of Cav-1 protein, and involves severely impaired expression of HIV-1 proteins."</em><br />
<a href="http://jvi.asm.org/content/76/18/9152.full" target="_blank">Blockade of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Expression by Caveolin-1</a></p>

<p><em>"In a previous study we showed that budding of HIV-1 particles occurs at highly specialized membrane microdomains known as lipid rafts. These microdomains are characterized by a distinct lipid composition that includes high concentrations of cholesterol, sphingolipids, and glycolipids. Since cholesterol is known to play a key role in the entry of some other viruses, our observation of HIV budding from lipid rafts led us to investigate the role in HIV-1 entry of cholesterol and lipid rafts in the plasma membrane of susceptible cells."</em><br />
<a href="http://ubik.microbiol.washington.edu/LabMtg/JournalClub/Liao1009.pdf" target="_blank">Lipid Rafts and HIV Pathogenesis: Host Membrane Cholesterol Is Required for Infection by HIV Type 1</a><br />
 <br />
Of course the thinking in the mainstream is if they reduce all of our cholesterol then HIV will go away.</p>

<p>This will simply kill off all our CD4 cells anyway so you see they think in gibberish.</p>

<p>It's a highly developed secret code of a language that no logical people can understand.<br />
 <br />
<strong>Is AIDS then in the main a disease of low Fat and Selenium, Vitamin C and Lysine?</p>

<p>And the HIV tests just pick up people with lesions or not enough fat in their diet.</strong></p>

<p><img alt="Cal_blue.jpg" src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/img/Cal_blue.jpg" width="400" height="395" class="mt-image-none" style="" /><br />
 <br />
I began asking a lot of questions like this when you could see people like Tine Van Der Maas fixing wounds with what they call Umlingo.<br />
<a href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/03/south_africa_umlingo_wamangcolosi_-_curing_aids_by_being_healthy.html" target="_blank">South Africa: Umlingo Wamangcolosi - 'Curing Aids' by Being Healthy</a><br />
 <br />
<em>Also becoming negative over there.</p>

<p>All their ingredients basically help heart disease etc.</em><br />
 <br />
So these were were articles I wrote this year.</p>

<p>Notes to self and everyone else.<br />
 <br />
I first concluded that CD4 T-cells respond to arterial fat.</p>

<p>If you want your T-cells to go up eat more food as long as you have the Vitamin C, Selenium/Glutathione and Lysine in the diet you won't get heart disease as these are the nutrients that cure heart disease.</p>

<p>Thanks to Sepp Hasslberger for all these posts.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/02/aids_cd4_t-cell_test_is_a_measure_of_fat.html" target="_blank">AIDS: CD4 T-Cell Test is a Measure of Fat</a></p>

<p>This is slightly off the fat subject but a descriptive analysis of what the HERV-W retrovirus does in pregnant women.</p>

<p>I think the fact that a retrovirus is so important for a proper pregnancy this is enough reason to completly ban the Mother to Child prevention campaign where they give disgusting drugs like AZT and Neverapine to women and children.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/06/what_do_retroviruses_do_when_pregnant-print.html" target="_blank">What do retroviruses do when pregnant?</a><br />
 <br />
This piece is trying to get a handle around the involvement of HIV in smooth muscle and arterial changes...</p>

<p>it's on the right track though for years I presumed Africans had higher levels of HLA-DR genes from genetic studies.</p>

<p>I think the genetic researchers I was reading didn't know HLA-DR is a lesion gene.</p>

<p>So the Africans they were testing perhaps just had less fat and vitamin C to patch up problems.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/10/aids_and_arteries_-_the_smooth_muscle_cd4_connection.html" target="_blank">Aids and Arteries - The smooth muscle CD4 connection</a></p>

<p><strong>So is HIV just in lesions?</strong></p>

<p>HIV appears with HLA-DR genes whatever they all do together but they both appear in lesions.</p>

<p>And p24 appears in HLA-DR+ cells which also happen to appear in normal non 'HIV infected' placentas...</p>

<p>It was the study that made me wonder why HLA-DR+ meant you would be HIV+.<br />
 <br />
<em>"Antigen p24 was localized to HLA-DR positive cells"</em><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1930645" target="_blank">HIV proteins in normal human placentae.</a><br />
 <br />
And here...HIV and HLA-DR cells are stuck together...did anyone wonder why? .<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/full/74/21/10256" target="_blank">Incorporation of HLA-DR into the Envelope of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 In Vivo: Correlation with Stage of Disease and Presence of Opportunistic Infection</a><br />
 <br />
"Oh they must be infected????" is the standard answer... but they don't know why and still are nowhere near finding out why.<br />
 <br />
So the Human Immune Retrovirus and p24 antigen only appear when HLA-DR are activated in lesions...<br />
 <br />
But the lesions go away with good nutrition and so does the p24 and HIV that appears with HLA-DR.</p>

<p>You can do it with any decent foods.<br />
 <br />
<em>"This study demonstrates that DR expressed on CD4+ T cells dramatically increases HIV-1 expression. Virus production in DR+ cells was > 10-fold higher than in DR- cells as measured by p24 production. Moreover, two T cell lines that were derived from the same parental cell, one DR+ and the other DR-, differentially expressed HIV-1 following transfection with full-length HIV-1 clone as determined by luciferase.<br />
Viral expression in DR+ transfectants were up to 20-fold higher than the DR- counterparts."</em><br />
<a href="http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=102188960.html" target="_blank">HLA-DR on T cells enhances HIV-1 expression</a><br />
 <br />
 <br />
And you also see HLA-DR and the CD4 T-cells in arterial changes and inflammation and lesions....</p>

<p><em>"HLA-DR was expressed on 28% (range 16-42%) of all T lymphocytes in the wall of the inflamed temporal artery, but only on average on 6% of peripheral blood T lymphocytes, indicating a high degree of local T cell activation in the <strong>inflammatory lesion."</strong></em><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1541465/pdf/clinexpimmunol00094-0090.pdf" target="_blank">HLA-DR expression in the vascular lesion and circulating T lymphocytes of patients with giant cell arteritis</a><br />
 <br />
<em>"HLA-DR expression was more often seen in macrophages and T cells in ruptures (25 of 28 cases) compared with expression in macrophages in superficial erosion arteries ...."</em><br />
<a href="http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/93/7/1354.short" target="_blank">Coronary Plaque Erosion Without Rupture Into a Lipid Core A Frequent Cause of Coronary Thrombosis in Sudden Coronary Death</a></p>

<p>And all other lesions such as kidney, liver, lung, skin, causes can be fungus, bacteria like TB, chemicals, solvents like benzene and alcohol, scurvy, smoking, cancer, etc etc have HLA-DR active in repairing the wound and HIV seems to be a part of that.<br />
Therefore HIV is just part of the wound process, if you are unlucky enough to have some form of lesion then HLA-DR+ activated cells appear and that's where HIV is.</p>

<p>You can google 'lesion' with any organ you pick and 'HLA-DR' and the 3 will appear.</p>

<p>I've tried kidney, liver, heart, lung, foot, brain, mouth, neck, stomach, gut...gum...oral and caries lesions...</p>

<p>They all come up bingo.</p>

<p>HLA-DR is not a racial gene as I once thought but one that kicks in for wound repair.</p>

<p>Africans and blacks in the US etc are just poorer so are battered about more as we all know from poverty.</p>

<p>And they also get tested more.</p>

<p>That is also an aspect of this epidemic, the medical profession have proved themselves to be blind bigots.</p>

<p>Very few doctors have even registered that the presumption that gays, prostitutes, junkies and Africans and Hispanics will be all carrying a sex virus is quite dodgy.</p>

<p>And if you test these groups over and over again with a dodgy test well someone will look positive.</p>

<p>This test that had nothing to do with a sex virus but was trying to pick up the 'leukemia' retroviruses we all get with cancer so of course the 'sex transmission' belief will stuff up all the data.<br />
 <br />
Intravenous drug addicts have lesions - well duh.</p>

<p>The gays that first appeared with 'AIDS' snorted drugs that made their lungs bleed.</p>

<p>Hemophiliacs bleed.</p>

<p>Only junkie prostitutes get AIDS the others get paid enough to eat properly.<br />
 <br />
Even sperm uses HLA-DR to attach with???<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.mbl.edu/publications/pub_archive/Botryllus/Botryllus.revised.html" target="_blank">"Remember that sperm binds to HLA-DR on white blood cells.</a> Interestingly enough, it turns out that the AIDS virus is covered with a protein coat that mimics HLA-DR in several important respects, including its structure. This suggests that sperm are able to attract and acquire AIDS virus particles."</p>

<p> <br />
This study may have clicked it all for me.<br />
 <br />
These African women became HIV after this using drug tenofovir which causes lesions.<br />
 <br />
<em>"About 127 Zimbabwean women who were HIV negative are feared to be now HIV positive after they participated in trials that were aimed at testing a set of drugs that medical experts thought could reduce the risk of infection."</em><br />
<a href="http://www.zimeye.org/?p=39644" target="_blank">HIV Negative Zimbabwean Women Test positive After Drug Trials</a><br />
 <br />
The drug causes lesion in all sorts of places like kidney and liver too.</p>

<p>Or skin rashes will do the trick to react with p24.</p>

<p><em>"Among 210 patients at 2 indigent care HIV clinics, 9 cases of tenofovir-associated skin reactions were reported. (23) Eight patients were diagnosed with tenofovir-related reactions--a pruritic eruption involving the face (n=7), extremities (n=5), trunk (n=4), and entire body (n=2) occurred within the first 2 weeks of tenofovir therapy. One patient developed concomitant urticarial lesions, angioedema, and shortness of breath. In 2 instances, skin lesions first developed after resumption of a previous tenofovir-containing regimen. Six out of the 8 patients were rechallenged with tenofovir or tenofovir/emtricitabine and developed recurrence of skin eruption and pruritus within 24 to 48 hours, resulting in permanent discontinuation of tenofovir. Three of these patients were taking efavirenz as part of their regimen, which is also associated with cutaneous reactions."</em><br />
<a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0PDG/is_10_5/ai_n19171649/pg_4/" target="_blank">Cutaneous drug reactions associated with newer antiretroviral agents</a></p>

<p><em>Or the<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16165166" target="_blank"> standard AZT</a> used in millions of gays, women and children...mice study but really what was anyone thinking?</em><br />
 <br />
<em>"Although MgD alone led to a 1.9-fold increase in plasma thromboxane B(2) (TXB(2), derived from the highly vasoconstrictive TXA(2)), AZT + MgD increased the TXB(2) level 3.5-fold. AZT (+/-MgD) provoked prominent hepatic damage expressed by distortion of lobular architecture, nuclear and cellular swelling, and inflammatory lesions and loss of hepatocytes. AZT alone caused mild cardiac lesions, resulting in partial cardiac fibrosis, especially in the atrium. AZT + MgD caused only scattered small-size cardiac lesions consisting of microscopic foci of inflammatory infiltrates in the ventricles but led to more prominent lesions, fibrosis, and scars in the atrium. MgD or AZT alone caused varying degrees of skeletal muscle degeneration; in combination, more intense degeneration and regeneration of muscle cells were evident."</em><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15371632" target="_blank">Cardiac pathologic effects of azidothymidine (AZT) in Mg-deficient mice</a><br />
 <br />
<strong><em>"AZT alone caused mild cardiac lesions, resulting in partial cardiac fibrosis, especially in the atrium."</em></strong><br />
 <br />
I'm going a bit further and I'm saying that antiretrovirals cause heart disease and blood poisoning, well of course it's no secret.</p>

<p>But even more so than that is the possibility that stopping HIV and other retroviruses makes us fall apart.</p>

<p>They are cell to cell fusion RNA in other retroviral studies.</p>

<p>What is different with HIV?</p>

<p>Did HIV just stay a vague cash in and everyone hoped no one will notice?</p>

<p>The transmitted claim really got the panic and money flowing and this has been from day one.</p>

<p>But if you fix lesions HIV goes.</p>

<p><img alt="Cal_Tree.jpg" src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/img/Cal_Tree.jpg" width="400" height="300" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></p>

<p><br />
<strong>NERD RESISTANCE</strong></p>

<p>All this analysis has little point unless it can be put into practice.</p>

<p>It looks very much as if repairing any lesions from psoriasis to candida or TB can stop the HIV test from cross reacting with your wounds.</p>

<p>Also the growth seen with leukemic T-cells is a HIV positive.</p>

<p>The advice below largely works on heart disease and leukemia so make up your own minds????</p>

<p>It won't hurt and if you do have real fungal or bacterial infections these things will help hold the body together.</p>

<p>I use Thyme tea and recommend copper foods with avoidance of iron foods in infections as a fix.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
<strong>HOW TO TRICK THE TEST</strong></p>

<p>"Three recombinant proteins from HIV-1 (p24, gp41 and gp120)".....these are the antigens to knock off....<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=102199042.html" target="_blank">New membrane assay for the detection of antibody to HIV-1 and HIV-2 using recombinant proteins.</a><br />
 <br />
I think you can try Bromelain, Turmeric, Olive Leaf Extract and and Green Tea, Sage or Lemon Balm to block the antigens.</p>

<p>Maybe not Sage a week before the test as it has estrogens which in theory could stimulate retroviruses.</p>

<p>Green tea definitely is needed.</p>

<p>Eat enough veggies like the brazil nuts, broccoli garlic for selenium, lemons and all the rest of the yum stuff with a folate and B12 supplement or food, that's for the viral load test.</p>

<p>Eat good amounts  fat  (: that keeps T-cells up and repairs wounds and get enough sun and sleep so you're hormones stay normal.</p>

<p>Cod liver oil if it rains or gets cloudy for days - as low Vitamin D makes viruses express - or sun.</p>

<p>When you stay in front of a computer at night you destroy the melatonin in your pineal gland and that effects things too.</p>

<p>So get good sleep.</p>

<p>Fish may be the best, it also has decent lysine levels, milk and red meat have a molecule we are allergic to and can cause inflammation.</p>

<p>Most of these recommended foods have anti-inflammatory effect.</p>

<p>CD44 is an attachment molecule that always turns up in tumours and is a good indication cancer will spread.</p>

<p>So HIV buds there.</p>

<p>There is a cross over with HLA-DR here, they occur together. <br />
 <br />
<em>"CD44 was concentrated in two locations: in clathrin coated pits and at the base of budding HIV virions. For many (although not all) virions, CD44 co-located with budding HIV and appears to form a "collar" at the base of the budding virus. We saw no differences in CD44 localization between HIVLAI/III and HIVBAL isolates, nor differences in HIVLAI/IIIB and HIVBAL gp120gp41 "spike and ball" morphology. No significant immunogold staining of ICAM-1 was seen in these same experiments although low expression of ICAM-1 on the cell surface was shown by indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. However, by using AA5 cells with high expression of ICAM-1 on the cell surface, an even distribution of ICAM-1 both HIVLAI/IIIB-infected and uninfected AA5 cells was observed. We saw only rare association of ICAM-1 molecules with HIV virions. Co-localization of CD44 with HIV virions at the site of virus budding supports the hypothesis that CD44 may be involved in HIV budding."</em><br />
<a href="http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=102222881.html" target="_blank">Co-localization of CD44 expression with HIV budding in HIV-infected cells.</a><br />
 <br />
I think and suspect Bromelain may have an effect on p24 but I may be wrong, I'll work out the maths later.</p>

<p>But it stops HIV budding in CD44.... so therefore the p24 is likely to disappear.</p>

<p>Be careful with bromelain being a blood thinner, it's good to be on lysine first with enough fat foods and make sure you have vitamin k in the diet to not bleed.</p>

<p>Bromelain has never made me bleed, I've been on it 4 years for psoriasis.</p>

<p>Green tea has vitamin K.</p>

<p>Bromelain knocks off CD44 so there is nowhere to bud.<br />
 <br />
<em>"CD44 cell surface proteins are involved in leukocyte binding to endothelium and the metastatic spread of tumor cells. Using flow cytometric analysis (FCMA), we investigated the effects of the proteases bromelain, papain, trypsin, and chymotrypsin on the density of CD44 molecules present on human leukemia Molt 4/8 cells. Bromelain was found to be most active in reducing CD44 receptor density."</em><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21559602" target="_blank">Bromelain proteinases modulate the cd44 expression on human molt-4/8 leukemia and sk-mel-28 melanoma-cells in-vitro.</a><br />
 <br />
And if HIV is as Gallo made out a retrovirus that appears with leukemia then bromelain will work as it cures leukemia.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3072510/" target="_blank">High levels of the adhesion molecule CD44 on leukemic cells generate acute myeloid leukemia relapse after withdrawal of the initial transforming event</a><br />
 <br />
Recent experimental study found that OLE (olive leaf extract) has anti-HIV activity by blocking the HIV virus entry to host cells <br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17537437" target="_blank">Computational study of bindings of olive leaf extract (OLE) to HIV-1 fusion protein gp41</a><br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/meeting_abstract/178/MeetingAbstracts/S69-c" target="_blank">Binding of the green tea catechin, epigallocatechin gallate, to the CD4 receptor on human immune cells resulting in inhibition of HIV-1-gp120 binding and HIV-1 infectivity</a><br />
 <br />
These teas below all have effect on wound healing by the way, as does green tea.</p>

<p>Try them all, Sage will stop dementia.<br />
 <br />
<em>"Extracts from lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.), peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.), and sage (Salvia officinalis L.) exhibited a high and concentration-dependent activity against the infection of HIV-1 in T-cell lines, primary macrophages, and in ex vivo tonsil histocultures with 50% inhibitory concentrations as low as 0.004%. The aqueous Lamiaceae extracts did not or only at very high concentrations interfere with cell viability. Mechanistically, extract exposure of free virions potently and rapidly inhibited infection, while exposure of surface-bound virions or target cells alone had virtually no antiviral effect. In line with this observation, a virion-fusion assay demonstrated that HIV-1 entry was drastically impaired following treatment of particles with Lamiaceae extracts, and the magnitude of this effect at the early stage of infection correlated with the inhibitory potency on HIV-1 replication. Extracts were active against virions carrying diverse envelopes (X4 and R5 HIV-1, vesicular stomatitis virus, ecotropic murine leukemia virus), but not against a non-enveloped adenovirus."</em><br />
<a href="http://www.retrovirology.com/content/5/1/27" target="_blank">Aqueous extracts from peppermint, sage and lemon balm leaves display potent anti-HIV-1 activity by increasing the virion density</a><br />
 <br />
Also use things like turmeric as this is used in leukemia to stop leukemic cells going out of control and any thing that stops leukemia naturally stops a so called "leukemia retrovirus" like HIV and while you're at it use coconut oil in the curries.</p>

<p>Tomatoes are fab too cos of lycopenes, artichoke pastas... actually all the foods with flavonoids have effect... lemons, berries etc..</p>

<p>Mushrooms I believe should thrown in a plenty due to wound healing properties and the sulphurs.. all of them</p>

<p>hope this helps </p>

<p><img alt="Cal_at_work.jpg" src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/img/Cal_at_work.jpg" width="400" height="300" class="mt-image-none" style="" /><br />
 <br />
<em>The reason things like coconut oil work on HIV is wound healing..</em><br />
 <br />
<a href="http://acudoc.com/Coconut%20oil%20study2.pdf" target="_blank">COCONUT OIL IN HEALTH AND DISEASE: ITS AND MONOLAURIN'S<br />
POTENTIAL AS CURE FOR HIV/AIDS*</a><br />
 <br />
<em>"RESULTS:<br />
VCO-treated wounds healed much faster, as indicated by a decreased time of complete epithelization and higher levels of various skin components. Pepsin-soluble collagen showed a significant increase in VCO- treated wounds, indicating a higher collagen cross-linking. Glycohydrolase activities were also found to be increased due to a higher turnover of collagen. Antioxidant enzyme activities, and reduced glutathione and malondialdehyde levels were found to be increased on the 10th day after wounding, which were found to have returned to normal levels on day 14 in the treated wounds. The lipid peroxide levels were found to be lower in the treated wounds. A histopathological study showed an increase in fibroblast proliferation and neovascularization in VCO-treated wounds compared to controls."</em><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20523108" target="_blank">Effect of topical application of virgin coconut oil on skin components and antioxidant status during dermal wound healing in young rats.</a><br />
 <br />
<em>"neovascularization in VCO-treated wounds compared to controls."</em><br />
Means it made new arteries, I think it gives fats for HIV to bind on and finish repairs.<br />
 <br />
Things like Butyrate are odd, they fix wounds.<br />
 <br />
<em>"Researchers working with an experimental drug for sickle cell anemia noticed an unexpected side effect: the incidental healing of debilitating leg ulcers in seven patients.</p>

<p>That serendipitous observation led to a 25-patient phase II study in which treatment with the compound, arginine butyrate, healed 17 of 37 leg ulcers. In contrast, among 24 ulcers that received standard local care for wounds, complete healing was documented for one ulcer.</p>

<p>Several of the participants had suffered with large open sores for decades."</em><br />
<a href="http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/446115" target="_blank">Arginine Butyrate Heals Sickle Cell Leg Ulcers</a><br />
 <br />
or a patent on Butyric for wound healing...<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/50635200/Methods-For-The-Treatment-Of-Wounds-Using-Butyric-Acid-Salts-And-Derivatives---Patent-5858365" target="_blank">Methods For The Treatment Of Wounds Using Butyric Acid Salts And Derivatives</a><br />
 <br />
<strong>Though butyric acid stimulates HIV!!! </strong><br />
 <br />
<em><a href="http://www.jimmunol.org/content/182/6/3688.full" target="_blank">We thus found that P. gingivalis could induce HIV-1 reactivation via chromatin modification and that butyric acid, one of the bacterial metabolites, is responsible for this effect.</a></em><br />
 <br />
My point being should you risk a therapy like butyrate that might stimulate HIV and fix your lesions???<br />
 <br />
Or use anti-retrovirals that stop HIV and create lesions????<br />
 <br />
As a final point <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10969740" target="_blank">retinoids in general seem to stimulate our retroviruses.</a><br />
That is Vitamin A.</p>

<p>I tell people to be careful with carrot juice as vitamin A hypomethylates DNA.</p>

<p>This also makes retroviruses come out of the genome.</p>

<p>Now if this was really bad for us then why is vitamin A so good for us in the right dose?<br />
 <br />
<em>"We show that levels of virus replication in monocytes cultured 7 days before and continuously after HIV infection in 1 to 10 microM retinoic acid were 10- to 20-fold greater than those of control cells."</em><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1560208" target="_blank">Enhanced HIV-1 replication in retinoid-treated monocytes</a><br />
 <br />
<strong>That's a lot more HIV in cells exposed to Vitamin A...!!!!!</strong><br />
 <br />
When people take steroids it kind of stops cells from growing and tones down cytokine activity and inflammation.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2009icr/ias/docs/072109_b.htmlll" target="_blank">inflammation</a> being where <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11807308" target="_blank">all the HIV</a> is.</p>

<p>But those types of steroids stop wound healing....<br />
 <br />
<em>"Anti-inflammatory corticosteroids significantly impair wound healing. Retinoids partially, but significantly, reverse this effect. Little is known about the mechanism of steroid retardation or retinoid reversal. We hypothesized that corticosteroids lower transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels and tissue deposition in wounds and that retinoids stimulate corticosteroid-impaired TGF-beta and IGF-I release and collagen production."</em><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11074878" target="_blank">Effects of steroids and retinoids on wound healing</a><br />
 <br />
But <em>"Retinoids partially, but significantly, reverse this effect."</em></p>

<p>Retinoids just switch on the critters or RNA or messengers or retroviruses or whatever you want to call them.</p>

<p>And this inexplicably leads to wounds healing.</p>

<p>While the nutrients that also make the retroviruses go back into DNA like B12 also patch the area.<br />
 <br />
<strong>B12 is better than drugs and it also methylates DNA so helps keep retroviral activity lower...</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.cfp.ca/content/54/4/529.full" target="_blank">Cutaneous lesions and vitamin B12 deficiency An often-forgotten link</a></p>

<p><img alt="Thirty_deg.jpg" src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/img/Thirty_deg.jpg" width="400" height="300" class="mt-image-none" style="" /><br />
 <br />
Don't look..<br />
 <br />
If you're desperate this works..<br />
 <br />
<em>"Human urine treatment orally produced a significant increase in the breaking strength, dry tissue weight and hydroxyproline content in dead space wound model. It was concluded that human urine applied topically or administered orally (10 ml/kg, p.o) possesses wound healing activity."</em><br />
<a href="http://www.rjpbcs.com/pdf/2010_1(3)/87.pdf" target="_blank">Wound healing activity of human urine in rats</a> <br />
 <br />
Thing is though it's really not funny, I'll cry when this is over.</p>

<p>A good guide to fixing yourself with google is type in "whatever you are using" well not literally, with the words "wounds" or "lesions".</p>

<p>And learn yourself, every person to their own taste.</p>

<p>Fix AIDS yourself.<br />
 <br />
I'm now summoning the dead to clear the way.</p>

<p><a href="http://reverbnation.com/helicalsun" target="_blank">Helical Sun</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ONE DRUG TO MAKE YOU HAPPY</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/11/one_drug_to_make_you_happy.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2011:/eng//3.3580</id>

    <published>2011-11-29T15:34:15Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-01T07:45:29Z</updated>

    <summary>NewsWithViews.com by Jonathan Emord, Constitutional Attorney and Author November 28, 2011 Psychiatric drugs are big sellers. They are among the best selling drugs made. In 2010, Americans or their insurers doled out some $16.1 billion for anti-psychotics; $11.6 billion for anti-depressants; and $7.2 billion for ADHD treatments. Within the last two decades the field of psychiatry has mushroomed from a fringe body of Sigmund Freud admirers to a mainstream player in the field of medical pharmacology, largely because of an unseemly union between that profession and the drug industry, leading to the creation of many never before known disease states and profitable ways to exploit those alleged diseases with psychiatric...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Toni</name>
        <uri>http://www.alfaomegaeditrice.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Money" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Psychiatry" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newswithviews.com">NewsWithViews.com</a><br />
by Jonathan Emord, Constitutional Attorney and Author<br />
November 28, 2011</p>
<p><img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201111291624.jpg" width="300" height="224" alt="201111291624.jpg" style="padding-top:10px;" /><br /></p>
<p>Psychiatric drugs are big sellers. They are among the best selling drugs made. In 2010, Americans or their insurers doled out some $16.1 billion for anti-psychotics; $11.6 billion for anti-depressants; and $7.2 billion for ADHD treatments.</p>
<p>Within the last two decades the field of psychiatry has mushroomed from a fringe body of Sigmund Freud admirers to a mainstream player in the field of medical pharmacology, largely because of an unseemly union between that profession and the drug industry, leading to the creation of many never before known disease states and profitable ways to exploit those alleged diseases with psychiatric services and drugs.</p>
<p>The field of psychiatry has persistent and well-informed critics who point to the excessive drugging of institutionalized patients, of children commonly misdiagnosed as suffering from <a href="http://www.newswithviewsstore.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&amp;Store_Code=NWVS&amp;Product_Code=B56&amp;Category_Code=BOOKS" target="_blank">Attention Deficit Disorder or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</a>, and of the elderly misdiagnosed with treatable dementia, among others. The drugs given these patients have their own side-effects, including increased risk of depression, suicidal thoughts, birth defects, and even death. Because of the movement of psychiatry from the fringe of medicine to its heart, a majority of Americans are likely to come into contact with psychiatric drugs, either recommended for use by their children or for use by them at some point in their lives. Indeed, presently some 1 in 5 adults take anti-depressants, anti-psychotic, or anti-anxiety drugs.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The next edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5), the profession’s so-called diagnostic bible, will soon be published in 2013. It comntinues the trend of identifying as “diseases” conditions that have previously been considered within the normal range. It adds to the list of “disease” states “apathy syndrome” (i.e., not caring enough); “internet addiction disorder” (i.e., liking the web too much); “parental alienation syndrome” (i.e., not liking your parents enough); “mild neurocognitive disorder” (i.e., age-related decline in mental function); “absexual” disorder (i.e., disliking sex); and “sluggish cognitive tempo” (i.e., daydreaming too much). Characteristics that we all used to think within the realm of normal brain function (such as teenage angst at parental rules; parental angst at teenage rebellion; a loss of quick wittedness in the elderly; youthful exuberance or youthful preoccupation with daydreams beyond the confines of academia) are all fast becoming “diseases.” The APA’s overall movement has been one of calling into question characteristics of eccentricity, leading to an unscientific conclusion that anything different may be rightly called a disease and rightly prescribed a treatment.<br /></p>
<p>Every newly identified psychiatric disorder begets a new slate of psychiatric drugs for their treatment, giving leading pharmaceutical companies new opportunities to profit from the expansion of psychiatric diagnoses. Psychiatric drugs are big sellers. They are among the best selling drugs made. In 2010, Americans or their insurers doled out some $16.1 billion for anti-psychotics; $11.6 billion for anti-depressants; and $7.2 billion for ADHD treatments.</p>
<p>Profit lies in designing drugs for the treatment of these conditions. As the drug industry continues to pump out new elixirs that, in turn, leads to more reliance on psychologists and psychiatrists, which leads them in turn to prefer identifying more conditions as disease. The perverse incentives abound, and the FDA is pleased to approve the drugs at the behest of the drug company sponsors.</p>
<p>Everyone standing to profit from the sale of these agents wins at the expense of patients.</p>
<p>The drugging of America is an enormous problem, having spill-over effects that include drug addiction and destruction of the family, productivity, even national security. With an ever rising population taking these drugs which alter cognitive function, it becomes ever more apparent that the very fabric of our society, its common commitment to stable family life, self-sacrifice for the greater good, and adherence to laws that protect life, liberty, and property are all imperiled. As the drug industry and psychiatric profession profits enormously with each new declared disease state, there is a loss of free agency in the population, a movement that saps self-control from the individual in favor of control by the medical community over basic life-affecting decisions. Patients become dependent, event addicted, to drugs, and ever more dependent on their medical counselors to cope with life.</p>
<p>Whatever may be said for use of psychiatric drugs in those who cannot function in society, the expansion of those drugs to embrace those who can, including those with virtually any characteristic that exceeds the norm, represents a horrific sacrifice of the very promise of life that lies in those eccentricities. It is particularly horrific to watch beautiful, energetic children with all their great promise become addicted to drugs that alter brain chemistry in ways that yield drug dependency and lessen their perception of and enthusiasm for life and their ability to achieve. A majority of children prescribed anti-depressant and anti-psychotic drugs are wrongly prescribed those drugs, even by accepted psychiatric standards. That misguided course is itself a form of deviant behavior by this profession, calling into question the mental stability of those who would profit off of misdiagnosis and mistreatment.</p>
<p><b>The psychiatric drugging of America is bearing and will continue to bear for generations to come toxic consequences, whether in the form of the destruction of the family, increases in crime, or decreases in productivity and inventiveness. It’s high time for a rebellion against this drugging for the sake of sanity.</b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan220.htm" target="_blank">http://www.newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan220.htm</a></p>
<p><i>Jonathan W. Emord is an attorney who practices constitutional and administrative law before the federal courts and agencies. Congressman Ron Paul calls Jonathan “a hero of the health freedom revolution” and says “all freedom-loving Americans are in [his] debt . . . for his courtroom [victories] on behalf of health freedom.” He has defeated the FDA in federal court a remarkable eight times, six on First Amendment grounds, and is the author of Amazon bestsellers The Rise of Tyranny, and Global Censorship of Health Information. He is also the American Justice columnist for U.S.A. Today Magazine. For more info visit Emord.com.</i></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Bold and Innovative Ideas for Increasing Vaccine Uptake</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.laleva.org/eng/2011/11/bold_and_innovative_ideas_for_increasing_vaccine_uptake.html" />
    <id>tag:www.laleva.org,2011:/eng//3.3579</id>

    <published>2011-11-28T15:56:56Z</published>
    <updated>2012-01-29T11:58:01Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[By Jagannath Chatterjee, (as submitted to vaccinechallenge.org) 27 November 2011 [This is in email consultation with doctors, medical scientists, advocates, media persons, public health activists, human rights activists, victims of vaccines and parents of vaccine damaged children, both in India and abroad] Our bold &amp; innovative ideas for increasing vaccine uptake are; 1. Conducting independent and unbiased vaccine safety research, both short term and long term, and also research on safety about the combined effect of various vaccines given to the children. 2. Compare the health of vaccinated vs non vaccinated children. 3. Identify all cases of vaccine induced deaths and damage. 4. Compensate parents of those children who died...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>sal</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Medicine Alternatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Pharma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Society" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Vaccines" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.laleva.org/eng/">
        <![CDATA[By Jagannath Chatterjee, (as submitted to vaccinechallenge.org)<br />
27 November 2011

<p>[This is in email consultation with doctors, medical scientists, advocates, media persons, public health activists, human rights activists, victims of vaccines and parents of vaccine damaged children, both in India and abroad]</p>
<p>Our bold &amp; innovative ideas for increasing vaccine uptake are;</p>
<p>1. Conducting independent and unbiased vaccine safety research, both short term and long term, and also research on safety about the combined effect of various vaccines given to the children.</p>
<p>2. Compare the health of vaccinated vs non vaccinated children.</p>
<p>3. Identify all cases of vaccine induced deaths and damage.</p>
<p>4. Compensate parents of those children who died because of vaccines. Identify children damaged and disabled due to vaccines, provide them free treatment for life, compensate them and rehabilitate them when they reach the employable age. Arrange for giving disability certificate to them so as to make it possible for them to avail all disabilty benefits.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>5. Remove mercury, aluminum, phenol, squalene, polysorbate 80 and other toxic chemicals from vaccines. Ensure that all vaccines are free from zoonotic virus contamination. In DNA vaccines ensure that there is no rDNA contamination. Prevent the use of human cell lines in vaccines.<br /></p>
<p>6. Inform Hindu's that bovine serum is used in vaccines, Muslims that porcine serum and gelatin is used in vaccines, and vegetarians that animal and human serum is used in vaccines.</p>
<p>7. Provide parents with full disclosure of all probable and possible risks from vaccines and take their written and informed consent before vaccinating their children. This should be read out to them in their own language and it should be ensured that they have properly and adequately understood and comprehended the information so provided.</p>
<p>8. Make it mandatory for doctors, health care workers and parents to report vaccine injury and death to a vaccine adverse effect reporting database. This database should be kept on public domain.</p>
<p>9. Ensure that all required and free legal aid is given to parents of vaccine effected children or victims if they want to sue the doctor/hospital/govt/vaccine manufacturer for vaccines manufactured, sold,recommended and administered by them.</p>
<p>10. Set up an advanced state of the art laboratory in India and in other developing nations to independently test all vaccines for toxic ingredients, contamination related zoonotic and human viruses, junk DNA and RNA material and fragments, and for the presence of bioterrorism agents and infertility agents, hormonal or otherwise.</p>
<p>11. These laboratories should also test the vaccines, both single and in combination with the other vaccines administered to infants and children in schedules recommended by the govt or other public medical bodies for a minimum period of 3 to 5 years against a control who should receive a plain sugar placebo and not any other vaccine or toxic element.</p>
<p>12. To determine generational effects, single and combination of all vaccines routinely given to children should be tested on at least three generations of mice to know the long term effects of vaccines.</p>
<p>13. Doctors should sign an warranty of vaccine safety and efficacy saying that the vaccines are 100% safe and effective, contain no harmful chemicals, heavy metals, neurotoxins, contaminated viruses, zoonotic or otherwise, in animal or human serums, and that in case of vaccine damage or death they will be held personally liable for payment of damages. They will also write that they will accept the parents claim of vaccine damage and will not influence them or threaten them in any manner, verbal or otherwise, when they report so. If they do not wish to sign such an warranty of vaccine safety and efficacy they should give in writing their reasons for not doing so. The format of such an warranty has already been submitted to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare in India but no acknowledgement of receipt has been received so far.</p>
<p>14. The government should through public newspaper and television advertisements inform the public regularly about all the ingredients of various vaccines, the probable and possible effects therefrom to infants and children singly and in combination, and the full range of short term and long term risks from vaccines so as to help the parents take an informed decision on the matter.</p>
<p>15. It should also declare that all vaccine deaths, damages and disability, whether short term or long term, will be acknowledged and not denied, ignored or otherwise explained.</p>
<p>16. It should also inform the public, after public consultation and debate, the quantum of compensation that should be paid to victims and how they should be given free treatment for life, given disability status and rehabilitated once they reach employable age.</p>
<p>17. It should declare that pregnant women, pre term children, low birth weight children, under nourished and malnourished children, children suffering from any immunity related disorders, chronic illness, sick children, children having a family history of vaccine damage, of having a family history of autoimmune disorders or serious chronic disorders will not be vaccinated as vaccines have never been tested for safety for these categorries as it is assumed and surmised that they face the maximum risk from vaccines.</p>
<p>18. It should be declared that only one vaccine should be given at one time. There should be enough space between vaccines and that all further vaccines should be stopped immediately if any vaccine damage from any vaccine is noticed.</p>
<p>19. Adverse vaccine reactions from each vaccine or from the combined vaccines administered to the pregnant women, infants and children should be taught in detail to doctors and the subject included in their medical textbooks. They should know each condition/damage that may arise from administering vaccines and be provided a detailed protocol for dealing with all possible vaccine damage cases so as to obtain the best possible results, the target being to attain full recovery, if possible.</p>
<p>20. There should be a free, informative and fair debate on vaccine risks on every possible forum with due representation of public, health activists and rights activists; this debate should be regularly carried out and all recommendations coming out of such debates should be available in public domain and should be sincerely and fairly implemented from time to time.</p>
<p>The committee involved in preparing this first draft recommendation reserves the right to make further changes to this draft document based upon further consultations and feedback received from time to time. The group wishes to be collectively known as The International Association of Concerned Citizen on Matters of Vaccine Safety and Research. (IACCMVSR). The committee does not profess to represent all stakeholders on the issue who have their own right to come out with their own set of recommendations on matters of vaccine safety and research.</p>
<p><br />
<img src="http://www.laleva.org/eng/201111281649.jpg" width="100" height="100" alt="201111281649.jpg" /></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

