Recently in AIDS Category

The human organism expresses retroviruses.

They are beneficial particles needed for immune defense, growth, and tissue repair.

Since retroviruses were observed in the first AIDS patients, it has been postulated - and it has since become firmly established dogma - that retroviruses "cause" AIDS. Anti-retroviral drugs are the treatment of choice for those who have tested positive to the protein which is a signature for retroviruses.

Of course killing the retrovirus also deprives us of the repair and defense functions they perform. And the drugs' side effects are often deadly for AIDS patients.

Perhaps to re-think our approach in this would be a good idea?

Do White Blood Cells use Retroviruses for Cell fusions?

by Cal Crilly

SPIDER.jpg

Alveolar macrophages (white blood cells) produce the Env protein of a human endogenous retrovirus, HERV-E 4-1, in a subgroup of interstitial lung diseases.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9115754

Ok I'll try and explain where the research is going and why retroviruses are also likely to appear in white blood cells or macrophages in response to real infections of bacteria and fungi (the retroviruses being functional and already in the macrophage/WBC DNA.)

The white blood cell monocytes or baby white blood cells join together into what they call 'giant cell multinucleated cells', this is in response to large infections, lots of dead cell debris, foreign bodies lodged in the body, anything that needs to be removed etc.
So baby monocyte cells look like they join together into what I call "Giant death star white blood cells" or macrophages made of many immature white blood cell monocytes bound together with retroviruses creating cell fusions.
TB and malaria are prime cases where giant cells are seen as a response to remove quite big bugs.

"Macrophages undergo fusion with other macrophages to form the hallmark multinucleated giant cells of chronic inflammation. However, neither the existence of distinct morphological types of giant cells, the signaling pathways that induce their formation, the molecular mechanism(s) of macrophage fusion, nor the significance of macrophage multinucleation at chronic inflammatory sites are well understood. Our efforts have been focused on these unknowns, particularly as they relate to the foreign body-type giant cells that form on implanted biomaterials and biomedical devices"
Macrophage fusion and multinucleated giant cells of inflammation.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21432016

  • Currently 5/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 5/5 (1 votes cast)

PreventDisease

July 17, 2013

by DAVE MIHALOVIC

The CDC has quickly removed a page from their website, which is now cached here , admitting that more than 98 million Americans received one or more doses of polio vaccine within an 8-year span from 1955-1963 when a proportion of the vaccine was contaminated with a cancer causing polyomavirus called SV40. It has been estimated that 10-30 million Americans could have received an SV40 contaminated dose of the vaccine.

201307181456.jpg

SV40 is an abbreviation for Simian vacuolating virus 40 or Simian virus 40, a polyomavirus that is found in both monkeys and humans. Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that has been found to cause tumors and cancer.

  • Currently 4/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 4/5 (3 votes cast)

by Jon Rappoport
June 8, 2012
www.nomorefakenews.com

I want to straighten out the thinking of many people who look at germs as the primary vehicle for reducing the global population. These are the people who continue to say, against all evidence, that the “pandemics” of the last few decades stemmed from deadly bio-engineered germs launched to kill massive numbers of people.

First and foremost, the “pandemics” were duds. West Nile, SARS, bird flu, swine flu. Even overblown estimates of swine flu deaths, worldwide, eventually settled in at about 20,000.

By comparison, according to the same organization that pegged the swine flu death total, the World Health Organization (WHO), annual deaths from ordinary non-pandemic seasonal flu range from 300,000 to 500,000.

Odd that swine flu is called a pandemic, while ordinary flu is ignored. Odd? Absurd.

  • Currently 5/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 5/5 (4 votes cast)

The more we research HIV, the less we seem to know about it.

After close to 30 years of research and billions spent, we have no cure, we have no vaccine, no proper prevention. We don't even have a clue about the mechanism HIV supposedly uses to cause degradation of the immune system.

Cal Crilly has gone down the rabbit hole again to put together some of that research. Apparently the 'virus' is found in situations that are part of normal human biology, of our defenses connected with heart disease and perhaps even cancer. Here are Cal's notes, in case you would like to follow this matter of HIV down to its - so far - illogical conclusion.

Caution: It's all speculative, although based on real research from the mainstream of medicine...

Cal says:

This may make some sense ... my brain notes, all speculation

alice-rabbithole.jpg


I think I've gone down the rabbit hole far enough now

This is all just speculation but all HIV is just speculation, tuck it away for the brain to process along with all the other thousands and thousands of arguments about what HIV is and how can something so small cause so many deaths etc.
I'm just writing it down.
Regardless I think it points to the fact that if you eat well and avoid toxic things then all these things they measure will go away.
Many people have their negative test results from the doctor to prove it.
My 70 year old HIV+ friend said this about my email on 'what HIV could do' below.

  • Currently 3.7/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)

Cashing in on our Sex and Retroviruses

| | Comments (0)

There are serious problems with the idea of testing for a retrovirus called HIV.

First of all, no one has given any explanation of just how that retrovirus is thought to degrade people's immune system. As a matter of fact, it cannot be isolated in sufficient quantities in the blood or tissues of people suffering immune deficiency to be doing what a virus is supposed to be doing.

But here is a central point that Cal Crilly brings out in this article: If that retrovirus, or rather the protein fractions we associate with antibodies to that virus, are present indistinctly in healthy and sick people, why are we testing at all?


Cashing in on our Sex and Retroviruses

by Cal Crilly

What is a HIV antibody test?

Does anyone know what the HIV antigens mean?

Here are the HIV numbers, do you think they are specific?

They were picked out of a hat in 1984.

hat-trick-francis-bedford.jpg



"The major antibody specificities detected in HIV-1 WB analysis include gp160, gp120, p65, p55, gp41, p40, p31, and p24. To be reported as positive, the WB assay requires reactivity against the gp41 and gp120/160 bands encoded by the env (gp160, envelope glycoprotein) gene or against either one of these env bands plus the p24 band encoded by gag [Pr55(Gag)]."
Interpretation of HIV Serologic Testing Results

So p24 antigens or 'HIV core proteins' are found in cell transport, yes a piece of 'retrovirus' appears when moving or trafficking things around the body.

The HIV antibody test sees these and the result claims you have AIDS, it is literally a lottery.

  • Currently 5/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 5/5 (2 votes cast)

The Polio Game

| | Comments (0)
Food Freedom News
April 17, 2012 By coto2admin
By Stan Burke

201204181007.jpg

How does one play the Polio Game?

One ignores that in 1949 there was a simple and cheap cure for polio if anyone happened to become ill.

One ignores that polio was actually one of the least serious of infectious diseases and of those who did catch it, only 1% were left paralyzed.

According to Dr. Dennis H. Geffen, O.B.E.. M.D.. D.P.H., of every 100 people who become infected with the virus, 90 per cent, remain symptomless, 9 show some slight sign of disease, such as sore throat or stiffness of the neck, whilst only 1 develops definite paralysis. He is reported in Public Health (March 1955) to have told the Metropolitan Branch, Society of Medical Officers of Health that:

“We are apt to forget that poliomyelitis is the least serious of all infectious diseases with the exception of that one complication or extension of the disease which destroys motor cells in the brain and spinal cord and causes paralysis. Apart from this it appears to be a mild infection lasting a few days, the symptoms of which are probably less serious than a cold in the head, and from which recovery is complete and immunity lasting. If we could be sure that an individual contracting poliomyelitis would not become paralysed then there might be much to be said for spreading the disease in order that a community might develop natural immunity.”

  • One ignores what actually happened when the vaccine was introduced.
  • Currently 4.2/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 4.2/5 (5 votes cast)
Prevent Disease.com
March 22, 2012



The overwhelming evidence of the curative powers of marijuana and cannabinoids leave little doubt that the pharmaceutical industry is behind marijuana prohibition laws. The amount of research now validating the truly remarkable nature of this healing plant is simply enormous. According to new findings published in the journal PLoS ONE, researchers have now have now discovered that marijuana-like chemicals trigger receptors on human immune cells that can directly inhibit a type of human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV) found in late-stage AIDS.201203221638.jpg

The U.S. Patent 6630507 was specifically initiated when researchers found that cannabinoids had specific antioxidant properties making them useful in the treatment and prophylaxis of wide variety of oxidation associated diseases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroprotectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and HIV dementia.

  • Currently 5/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 5/5 (6 votes cast)

Infowars Ireland
10/12/2011
S. Edmonson for Salem-News.com
Nov-29-2011

201112120950.jpg

Experts say families need to take a critical look at vaccines.

“The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination” – Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) – Have you been rushing out to get a yearly flu vaccine or diligently taking your children for the 40 or so mandated childhood vaccines?

That’s really a shame because you have unwittingly been trading a run-of-the-mill flu or just the measles, for loading up your or your children’s bodies with cancer and other deadly viruses, a destructive bacteria, a chemical selected to damage fertility, and with synthetic DNA that threatens to damage your own DNA – the biologic code for your existence.

Who is saying the vaccines are contaminated?

  • Currently 5/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 5/5 (9 votes cast)

Retroviral Talk: Is HIV Just in Lesions?

|


International Aids Day Special - Listening to medical propaganda, one would think a retrovirus is a very bad thing - something to be killed immediately wherever it is found. But nothing could be further from the truth.

Just like cholesterol has been condemned as "bad" and this lie has given rise to a billion-dollar industry of useless and even damaging cholesterol lowering (statin) drugs, so have retrovira been condemned, giving rise to a billion-dollar industry of Aids research and pharmaceutical intervention, to cocktails of "anti-retroviral" drugs they tell us are a must for anyone reacting to that very unspecific test that shows up stressed proteins associated with HIV. The retrovirus being targeted, HIV, incidentally has never been shown to do anything that could be construed as destroying the human immune system. As a matter of fact, it seems to be a necessary component of healing wounds and lesions, as Cal Crilly has discovered.

Cal is one of the few people who are able and willing to look at these details. His latest brainchild is a question: "Is HIV to be found just in lesions?"

Good reading!


I've been looking at this subject for nearly 14 years now, I guess I stumbled in on a mess.

I often say if you analyse gibberish you may be talking gibberish so anything I write you can decide.

The main thing to know is that everything written about HIV in the last 26 years by the mainstream is complete rubbish and utterly dangerous and if you don't question it you'll miss out on seeing the panic as people realise it's gibberish.

I've talked to many friends who got tagged by the HIV test and the incredible mess the medical profession put them through.

Some did not survive and this is entirely due to medical incompetence.

But this incompetence goes to the very top and they are the ones who need to step out of the way and admit they stuffed up.

For as long as the HIV debacle goes on as is no one in the medical profession can hold their head up high.

Unless they were one of the few that spoke out.

Cal_Stock-market-crash.jpg

These were my conclusions after a year or two of looking into the heart disease aspect of HIV 'infection'.

We are overall looking at heart disease, leukemia and cancers and the immune failure seen with AIDS is a result of medical incompetence, adding in drug users simply doesn't count.

They all end up with liver damage and immune failure anyway.

  • Currently 5/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 5/5 (4 votes cast)

HIV tests are better than 99% accurate?

| | Comments (1)

but as they say, the devil is in the details.

See this explanation of what a greater than 99% accuracy actually means... and when you next hear about someone having tested positive for "HIV", tell them to do their homework before becoming too worried.


HIV tests are better than 99% accurate...

by Gos Blank


...BUT there's a catch: If you test positive, "accuracy" is a meaningless term. No competent and responsible medical professional should EVER use the term "accuracy" to describe a positive HIV test result. (And yet, 99% of HIV testing professionals do this regularly, suggesting that they are neither competent nor responsible.)

Here's why:

If you tested a large group of randomly-selected Americans for HIV, more than 99% of them would test negative.

Now, just for the sake of argument, let's say, hypothetically speaking, that there were no such thing as HIV. In such a scenario, all positive results would be false-positives, meaning that a positive test would have ZERO accuracy, since there would be no virus for you to be "positive" for in the first place. And yet, the overall accuracy of the test would still be >99%, because >99% of the test results would be true-negatives.

Thus, it would be mathematically impossible for an HIV test to be less than 99% accurate, even if there were no such thing as HIV.

  • Currently 5/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 5/5 (7 votes cast)

Receive updates

Subscribe to get updates of this site by email:

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Other sites of ours