First off, I have radical ideas, so will have to describe them to get to the reasons why I see HIV as an arterial retrovirus.
I believe that viruses and retroviruses are in our genome.
When someone gives you a virus it's a 'viral outbreak' from their own DNA.
If you have exposed DNA then the symptoms are simply caused by insertions of someone else's DNA into yours.
The cure being make sure your cell walls are healthy and you don't have exposed DNA.
These thoughts are from literally a decade of looking at studies in PubMed.
While other folk have been checking out reality TV and insane Youtube clips and chatting about inane things online I've been perusing studies so I'm not very hippy about this.
If I'm saying this is 'what the?' data you have to deal with the fact that I may be pointing at something very awkwardly real when interpreted into the real world.
So Herpes viruses in particular have this dalliance with collagen and get blamed as a cofactor in all the degenerative diseases like Heart Disease, Arthritis and Multiple Sclerosis.
Almost everyone with a brain tumour has had mouth Herpes or cold sores, why?
But cancer researchers can also use Herpes viruses to dismantle a tumour from the inside .
So it's like Herpes was meant to break down collagen and expose DNA for digestion?
Who knows?
Herpes viruses and other viruses seem to appear magically after DNA damage.
You have Herpes infections of eyes post laser surgery and following sunburn.
Shingles can happen after sunburn....
Chemicals, heavy metal exposure, some drugs, radiation exposure and bad diet all leads to DNA exposure and this looks like the main source of our viral outbreaks.
The big 'what the' for me though is the spontaneous eruptions of cytomegalovirus when women get pregnant.
Time and time again I would read researchers say 'we don't know the source of the cytomegalovirus infection?'
Well viruses have a dalliance with arterial changes as well as collagen so when women get pregnant it looks like cytomegalovirus dismantles old unwanted arteries.
Unwanted because the baby is about to pinch 40% of the mum's blood supply so the old arteries are just way too small for the job.
But retroviruses also seem to appear in this process after T-cells and white blood cells remove old dead cellular debri.
After as in it seems the retroviruses appear with the new growth?
This is why they turn up with the placenta and tumour cells and all the areas where people with autoimmune disease have lesions or damaged cells in the process of trying to repair the body structure.
They also say reverse transcriptase is used by retroviruses but it is really a measure of cell growth.
Just type in "reverse transcriptase cell growth" into a google.
So my explanations say for Ebola would be that since most Ebola outbreaks seem to occur within 2 years of a Measles vaccine campaign the live Measles virus they use in Africans who are low in Vitamin C, Lysine and Selenium causes an unravelling of DNA from the inside of people and without enough Vitamin C and Lysine to create collagen and make antibodies a person continues to unravel.
Here in Queensland Australia we have an outbreak of a so called horse virus called 'Hendra Virus' which they blame bats for passing on to horses via their excrement.
In my book the obvious cause then is pesticides, the bats eat fruit laden with poison that damages their DNA and cells, the dying cells express exposed DNA.
That exposed DNA can be picked up by the horses who may or may not deal with stabilising their DNA before the unravelling becomes deadly.
In the modern world we are now getting exposed to drugs, heavy metals, pesticides, GMO's, preservatives, colourings, fluoride, benzene from petrol, radiation from thousands of sources plus the odd leaking nuclear power plant etc.
This exposes our DNA so expect more viral outbreaks.
Solar storms and positively charged winds also give people the sort of radiation and electrical changes that expose DNA.
In short exposed DNA is dangerous.
I see the mass culling of cows say with mad cow disease as happened as medieval.
The same goes for the slaughter of millions of birds 'infected' with bird flu.
The cows got mad cow from organophosphate insectides, well known for causing brain damage
If you just let the birds get the flu some will get over it and some won't.
Dressing up in white suits and culling animals in a bizarre ritual to cleanse the world is a cult like activity.
You just don't eat the poor animals until they get well again.
If a researcher wants to experiment with this all you need to do is scrape off some of your own cells.
Dissolve your cells in Benzene and let it evaporate, this will wreck the cell walls and expose your DNA.
Then expose the muck and DNA to a hypomethylating chemical which will expose DNA further.
You then leave it in an Arginine solution to destabilise the Histones.
Leave it all in a positive ion chamber and I'll bet you watch viruses grow out of your DNA.
Has anyone tried it?
Now I am going to use quotes from Alfred Hassig, the former president of the Board of Trustees of the International Society of Blood Transfusion between 1982 and 1984.
In other words the head of the Swiss Red Cross Transfusion Service.
He said and I repeat in memory of all those frightened and poisoned to death by this shoddy HIV science.
"It is the duty of every medical doctor to preserve life at any cost - the Hippocratic Oath - and not death-curse people based on any test so they are so frightened they kill themselves. I am sad to say that these voodoo methods were practised despite there never being any proof that the detected antibodies - suggested as specific to a retrovirus - are an indication of mortality in all diagnosed people."
This is the quote that puts in context my description of HIV as an arterial retrovirus.
The immune system itself is not all about foreign invaders.
If you have healthy intact cell walls and a clean water supply bugs should be a minimal problem for the immune system.
The main thing the immune system must deal with now is sugar and fat and all the poisons we use habitually since we became fans of science.
"The human immune system was conceived of only in its function against foreign (non-self) structures. The Nobel laureates Burnet, Medawar and Jerne have completely neglected the main function of the human immune system. The human organism dismantles about 1 billion body cells every day. One part of our immune system - the T-cells from the Thymus gland - is in charge of cleaning up this altered-self material. In a healthy organism the immune functions of antibodies produced by B-cells, and of the cytotoxic or cell-clearing T-cells, remain in balance."
I have an autoimmune drama in that my T-cells can get a bit excited and if they get out of control can really rip my skin to shreds.
Hence my memories of my 'immune' system are of my entire outer skin layer being removed by thousands of burning white blood cell clusters until all the Benzene and Nitrate chemicals I had been exposed to were gone with the dead skin.
It's called a cytokine storm and people can die from it in so in hospital they just dole out corticosteroids to stop the immune system from dissolving you.
I use Bromelain now and the odd dab of corticosteroid cream.
The main pattern of AIDS goes like this.
Poison exposure from recreational or doctor drugs.
Immune overload and autommune symptoms as the body's T-cells try to clear the clutter.
This is then suppressed with corticosteroids which switch off the T-cells so the T-cells job in removing dead cells and poisons with white blood cells just stops and people clog up and die.
But Alfred also asked "why are Africans always HIV positive?"
"I was invited as an expert by the Supreme Court in Melbourne, Australia, to comment on whether the blood product Factor VIII used by people with haemophilia, could possibly transmit HIV, in 1990. I had to consult the scientific literature on AIDS. I found inaccuracies in the 'HIV/AIDS' statistics compared with the reality in different countries. I was especially attentive to the fact that AIDS diagnoses in Africa seemed common; in Asia however - despite the high incidence of so-called HIV-positivity - there were relatively very few AIDS diagnoses. One particular study caught my attention. It was carried out in Trinidad. From the almost equal numbers of positive Afro-Trinidadians and Indo-Trinidadians - each about 40%, with both about the same percentage of homosexual activity - only the Africans died with AIDS diagnoses. Why? As an immunologist focusing on nutrition I soon realised the specific nutritional components. Asians have a highly antioxidative diet, for example with curry. These findings caused serious doubts whether the perceived AID Syndrome was being sufficiently explained by "HIV".
Well Africans seem to have more HLA-DR antigens either from having sickle cell anemia or some other historical genetic reason....
Or simply from more heart disease due to dietary differences as Alfred just said.
And AIDS tests are applied to "At risk groups"
Our own doctors may be simply creating an 'epidemic' by testing the same people over and over again...
...but this below is what I think the testing really meant.
Recent Comments