Share |

PrintPrintable version

Fluoridation: The scam of the century

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)
February 16, 2011 by Infowars Ireland
by Hesh Goldstein
Natural News

February 15, 2011


(NaturalNews) This scam starts as follows: the CDC (Centers For Deceit Control and Procrastination) in their Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report of August 17, 2001/Vol 50/ No. RR-14 entitled "Recommendations for Using Fluoride to Prevent and Control Dental Caries in the United States, says on page 4, 5th paragraph, "that fluoride's predominant effect is after the tooth comes into the mouth and on the surface of the tooth".

The question posed to the CDC, the EPA, and the Public Health officials of "why then do we have to ingest it?" NEVER gets answered.

Then there's the issue of INFORMED CONSENT. Every doctor knows that they can't force any medication on an individual without their informed consent. The doctor has to tell the patient of the benefits and of any side effects of a prescribed medication. This puts the final decision to take or not take the medication in the hands of the patient. In addition, the patient has the right to question any treatment so as to make a better decision.

Fluoridation clearly violates this principle.

One of the arguments presented by those that push this crap is to say that no one is forced to drink the water. Yes, the fluoride comes to the tap but ultimately it's the individual's choice to open the tap and drink the water. Please stop laughing. This is their serious argument.

Another argument is that fluoride is not a drug but rather it is a nutrient. So when the question of since when is the toxic waste by-product of the phosphate fertilizer industry or the aluminum or steel industry a nutrient? They usually look at their watches and tell you that they hear their mother calling them and they have to go.

If it is indeed a nutrient why then do the CDC and the ADA (American Dimwit Association), the major pushers of fluoridation in the U.S., say that tooth decay is a "chronic infectious disease" and recommend fluoride to combat this disease? And why does the Fraud and Drug Administration call fluoride an "unapproved" drug? What a classic example of blatant hypocrisy and the anything goes mentality to make money for the pimp.

Earl Baldwin, a member of the British House of Lords and one of the advisory board members for the York Review, the UK sponsored review of fluoridation had this to say: "What physician do you know, who in his or her right mind, would treat someone he does not know and has never met, with a substance that's meant to do change in their bodies, with the advice: 'Take as much, or as little, as you like, but take it for a lifetime because it may help someone's teeth'?"

With fluoridation there is no control over who gets the "medication" or the dosage. What if someone is particularly sensitive to the substance? Tough! What if you're an athlete and drink a gallon of water a day? Tough!

When a person consumes a medication, say aspirin for example, isn't the dose for an infant or a child different that that for an adult? Obviously. With fluoride it's a one-fits-all mentality.

Let's say for a moment that the ingestion of fluoride is a good thing. Who gets more? Your body or your dishes when you wash them, your car when you wash it, your lawn when you water it, or the environment when you flush the toilet? You answer that one and then let me know if mandated fluoridation is a good thing or a bad thing.

Should you raise the issue of reduced tooth decay it has already be proven and documented that those living in unfluoridated communities have virtually the same rates of tooth decay as those living in fluoridated communities. But, there is one profound difference: those living in fluoridated communities have a much, much greater risk of dental fluorosis, which is symptomatic of the discoloration and eventual mottling of the teeth leading to a lifetime of cosmetic veneers or living with the disfiguration.

As if ruining your teeth isn't enough there has been credible documentation showing other debilitating effects. Dr. Phyllis Mullenix proved that fluoride had an adverse effect on the brain. As a result she was told that her work "was no longer relevant to dentistry" and fired. Peer-reviewed studies showing adverse effects on the thyroid gland were ignored as were studies linking fluoride to damage of the pineal gland. The pineal gland is located between the two hemispheres of the brain and is responsible for the synthesis and secretion of melatonin. Melatonin affects jet lag, sleep patterns and aging and by the time old age hits, the accumulation of fluoride in the pineal gland is in very high concentrations.

But wait, there's more. There is also a profound connection between fluoride and bone damage. With symptoms almost identical to arthritis beginning with aching bones and joints. But the best cover-up had to come out of Harvard University. Elise Bassin, as part of her 2001 doctoral thesis for her dental degree, found a connection between fluoride and bone cancer in adolescent boys. When she submitted her finding to Dr. Chester Douglas, the head of Harvard's Dental School, he omitted that finding when releasing her thesis. Why would he do this? Maybe the fact that he was on the payroll of the Colgate-Palmolive Company had something to do with it. Somehow, years later, Bassin's finding were found and released causing Harvard to do a complete investigation on Dr. Douglas. During the investigation Dr. Douglas made a $2 million donation to Harvard and was eventually exonerated.

One other finding was an adverse effect on the kidneys. It was found that fluoride can damage the kidneys at high levels and that someone with poor kidney function would have limitations clearing fluoride from the body making that person especially vulnerable to fluoride's other toxic effects. Read more...

Related posts:

1. 11 Facts About Fluoride 1. Fluoride was the first thing the Nazis put...

2. EU study on water fluoridation, lacking important detail Antony Pudney 8th August 2010 The EU analysis of...

3. Cancer-Causing Toxins Detected in Fluoride Chemicals, Says NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation NEW YORK, /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ - Traces of arsenic, copper, lead and...

4. John Gormley: Fluoride, GMO and the Rockefeller Communist 'Coincidence'! By Neil Foster 3rd July 2010. The facts on...

5. Forced Fluoridation in Ireland Chemical Fluoride Fluoride is added to our drinking water to...

6. Government Recommends Lowering Fluoride Levels in U.S. Drinking Water CNN Friday, January 7, 2011 (CNN) -- The U.S. Department...

7. Water Fluoridation: Part I Few health issues are accepted as uncritically, at least in...

8. Ireland's Drinking Water - Poisoned By Design By Colin 26 September, 2010 The other day I...

9. Judge gives go-ahead to add fluoride to city's tap water supply - despite overwhelming public opposition By Jenny Hope Daily Mail 12th February 2011 Plans to...

10. Fluoridation -- Fluoride Toxic Chemicals In Your Water Note: For more information on health-building techniques, please see...

  • Currently 3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3/5 (4 votes cast)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Fluoridation: The scam of the century.

TrackBack URL for this entry:


Teeth cleaning

For brushing teeth is not necessary to use detergent as when you degrease the dirty dishes!

The teeth are always immersed in saliva, which alone has power degreaser!

For cleaning the teeth the best thing to do is just brush them with water to take away "all"the bits of food that will not stop!

Saliva keeps them clean until the next brushing! Use the toothpaste is unnatural and totally unnecessary!

Brushing your teeth and mouth with water and you relief as well as healthy teeth and gums strong "no bleeding!


Per lavare i denti non è necessario usare del detersivo come quando si sgrassano i piatti sporchi! I denti sono immersi nella saliva che da sola ha potere sgrassante! Per la pulizia dei denti la cosa migliore da fare è spazzolarli soltanto con acqua in modo da portare via tutti i frammenti di cibo che vi si fermano! La saliva li mantiene puliti fino alla successiva spazzolatura! Usare la pasta dentifricia è contro natura ed assolutamente non necessaria!
Lavate i denti ed il cavo orale con acqua pura ed avrete sollievo oltre che denti sani e gengive forti "non sanguinanti"!


Leave a comment

Health Supreme News

Powered by Movable Type 5.13-en

Receive updates

Subscribe to get updates of this site by email:

Enter your Email

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Recent Comments

Other sites of ours